Comments Thread For: Potential Crawford Conquest Adds New Layer To Pac-Mayweather Debate

[PeepeePoopooMan]

It's true that Floyd schooled Canelo and his resume keeps looking better and better with every Alvarez win.

But that has nothing to do with me.

You ma'am are a complete idiot

[Fair Shake]

The fact that Manny had McGregor lined up for his next fight is everything you need to know

[Roadblock]

Same. I dont see it happening. At this point pac can fight whomever he wants. Only morons say pac still has something to prove and should fight spencer or crawford.

I agree just wish he would keep them out of his mouth though.

[Liondw]

Good read, and Floyd is an all-time great.

Although, let's not forget he lost the first fight against Castillo, and had close fights with Oscar and the first one with Maidana, and a rather underwhelming fight against Pacquiao.

Pacman also a legend, and nothing against him if he doesn't fight Crawford.

[The Old LefHook]

Wow! What a Mayweather testicle polisher this Fitzsimmons is, eh?

[Bronx2245]

Pacquiao can never surpass Floyd because Marquez gave him way too many problems, and Floyd beat Pacquiao head to head! However, Pacquiao is still an ATG, and beating Crawford (or Spence) would be LEGENDARY! I don't think he can, but then again, B-Hop beat Winky Wright @ 42, Pavlik @ 43, and Pascal @ 46, so you never know!

[Rapscallion]

And yet that is the fight Pacquiao wanted before McGregor derailed tnose plans by losing his last fight by KO, lol.

Right you are; however, as Mayweather selected McGregor for his fiftieth win, he even diminished that record. Another thought: I just wish that we could have seen Mayweather fight Manny back in 2011.

[landotter]

Right you are; however, as Mayweather selected McGregor for his fiftieth win, he even diminished that record. Another thought: I just wish that we could have seen Mayweather fight Manny back in 2011.

Oh Amen to that.... like I really wish Alvarez would have tussled with Golovkin 2 years earlier than he did instead of dropping his MW title. But those fights happened when they did. All of them got paid, and Mayweather has that victory he never needs to justify over his closest peer, like Alvarez has over Golovkin.

To me, this is a silly debate. In resume, Pacquiao has it all over Mayweather, so if you judge a boxer by who he has fought as opposed to just his record, you favor Manny. If you judge head to head higher, you favor Mayweather. If Manny were to beat another top 147 fighter at this stage of his career, it would not make a bit of difference to either of those camps of thought. Both, however, are Hall of Fame first ballot slam dunks who own an amazing portion of boxing history all to themselves and do not have one more thing to prove.

[Ray*]

If Pacman beats Crawford then he would defnitely get over Mayweather on the list for me, and i say that as a Flomo.

[1hourRun]

A new order begins! Out with the old, in with the new. Time for bed grandpa, we are tired of your old exaggerated tales of the countless wars you been in and seen, night-night! TBE? NAH! ITS TBC!