Whyte the coward runs from title shot again if it ever becomes real. Until then he'll keep yelling and bluffing. Just like the last title shot he was offered by Eddie last year
Comments Thread For: Whyte: No Reason I Should Wait Anymore; Molina, Breazeale Got 2 Title Shots
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Guess we’re gonna have to listen to this c*** run his mouth constantly again. Whyte is the most delusional man in boxing.
He probably got offered more money to fight AJ than Brezeale and Molina got in there 4 title shots combined, yet he turned it down and somehow he’s the victim in all this.Comment
-
To put that into context Carl Froch who had 12 world title fights going 10-2 only headlined 3 PPV’s.
Meanwhile this Whyte pr*** who has ZERO world title fights, ZERO European title fights and is even 1-1 in British title fights is headlining PPV’s left right and centre. It’s an absolute disgrace...Comment
-
Carl Froch had one of the best records of top fighters faced when it mattered. Other than Yusef Mack they were all top fighters or considered top fighters at the time he faced him. Whyte has some names in there but not that makes him outstanding. I do give him credit to getting the decision against Parker.Comment
-
This guy Marchegiano is like talking to a rock and not the Marchegiano Rocky one either .
I don’t believe he’s pretending to do anything ,I honestly thinks he’s just that ****** which is even worse . Good luck reasoning with him you should know he’s the worst poster on here mentally to . Ha
Well, yeah, but what agenda is that? You seem to think I've posted an opinion about Whyte or Whyte ducking or Ortiz ducking or whatever. No, I saw some **** that was blatantly wrong and corrected it.
If you want to argue with a guy who said Whyte ducked then go ahead, I don't care, but if you're going to defend Whyte don't tell lies like "But da Silver title doe, it made him mando doe" it didn't and never did. That's the beginning and end of my agenda I won't let you steer me out of.
Those are the parts because that's the extent. It being a secondary mando isn't anything I corrected so I'm confused as to why I am meant to give a **** or why I'm being accused of some poorly hidden motive. It's very much on the surface, Redeemer was wrong and I pointed it out....everything else is bull**** y'all want to talk about that doesn't negate redeemer being wrong in any way even a little bit.
To be very blunt, I don't care and didn't argue about who ducked who.
Um, okay?Comment
Comment