Saunders in good shape, 6 weeks out

[Boxing-1013]

When did Canelo get a favorable decision that he clearly should have lost instead? It's hilarious seeing the responses from you guys because you can't answer a simple question.

It all boils down to just 2 boxers, Lara and Golovkin. (And among the lunatic fringe possibly Austin Trout, even though Canelo dropped his ass.) That's what all this crying and whining is about.

2 freaking guys in fights that were close and could have gone either way. That's pathetic, but when people are dead set on hating someone there's no stopping their emotional menstruation I guess.

If Billy Joe Saunders can clearly beat Canelo then he will win on the cards. I don't expect a blatant robbery since there has never been one in Canelo's entire career.

I've already explained this to you before. I guess Canelo fanboys can't handle the truth lol. You must be getting paid to post the absolute bullsh.it you're posting on here.

In a big fight, you can't beat a guy like Canelo 12-0 lol. The best you can hope is to beat him pretty clearly in about half the rounds. And then the other half be pretty close. That's what GGG did to him. That is a clear win for that guy all day man. That's really the best you can do.

Saying sh.it like 'no one has clearly beat Canelo in a fight and been robbed' lol. What does that mean, they have to win every round on a super fan like yours scorecard? lol Yeah he's never been robbed then lol.

Absolutely pathetic to demonstrate this much as you're doing, acting like Canelo doesn't get very favorable treatment. It is embarrassing dude. Even for you!

[deathofaclown]

No, man. Just No.

Save this post and come back on may 8th and say I was right

[kafkod]

Again. Boxing has 3 judges. Citing CJ Ross even for a Draw means nothing when two other judges assured Floyd won. That’s the point of 3 judges. You’re not even consistent with “bias” since Byrd had Khan beating Canelo and CJ Ross never judged again. So you guys expose yourselves lol

So the point of having 3 judges is to make it ok for one of them to be biased ?

That's one of the dumbest things you have ever posted, which is saying a lot.

[Thuglife Nelo]

So the point of having 3 judges is to make it ok for one of them to be biased ?

That's one of the dumbest things you have ever posted, which is saying a lot.

More than one judge is to acknowledge margin of error... lol

Yeah judges are androids and are preprogrammed to score exactly the same because they were all born in the same hospital. In fact, candidates all think the same and physically do things in synchronization better than aliens.

[Leonbus2]

1. Canelo is A side
2. Canelo is Mexican fighting in Texas, a state with a large Mexican population.
3. The fight is in Texas, which has a tradition of suspect judging, usually to benefit Mexicans.

Texas rules:
1. Local Mexican fighter wins.
2. If two Mexicans than local Mexican wins.
3. If two Mexicans and neither is local, then A side wins.
4. If local non-mexican (including other hispanics) vs Mexican, then Mexican wins.
5. If local non-mexican vs. Nonlocal non-mexican, then local non-mexican wins.
6. If hispanic vs nonlocal non-hispanic than hispanic wins.

[Hype job]

For anybody that was gullible enough to believe Saunders when he said he was 30 lbs overweight

He doesn't stay in the best shape outside of camp. He smokes too.

[sicko]

Good For Him! I just want to see Canelo in a Competitive fight instead of him making it look like these guys are taking Dives for him because he is dominating them so easy like he did Callum Smith and Yildirim. I think...HOPE BJS brings his Best and look Sharp like he did vs Lemieux and Monroe Jr. if he does then this will be Canelo's toughest fight in a while stylistically

[Cobratu]

1. Canelo is A side
2. Canelo is Mexican fighting in Texas, a state with a large Mexican population.
3. The fight is in Texas, which has a tradition of suspect judging, usually to benefit Mexicans.

Texas rules:
1. Local Mexican fighter wins.
2. If two Mexicans than local Mexican wins.
3. If two Mexicans and neither is local, then A side wins.
4. If local non-mexican (including other hispanics) vs Mexican, then Mexican wins.
5. If local non-mexican vs. Nonlocal non-mexican, then local non-mexican wins.
6. If hispanic vs nonlocal non-hispanic than hispanic wins.

You seem to have a lot of insecurities.

everthing you said can be said for any white fighter in middle America and black fighter in DC, Atalanta etc.

[Leonbus2]

You seem to have a lot of insecurities.

everthing you said can be said for any white fighter in middle America and black fighter in DC, Atalanta etc.

I agree with you. UK officials are some of the worst for favoring UK fighters. So, yes. You're making my point.

I almost added that to my initial post, but I figured it was implied. Anyway, you are right about judges and favoritism in locales.