Tweet
You’re not being honest. Citing one judge conspiracy theories don’t outweigh 2-3 judge cards whom all had it wide or close for a fight that didn’t match what was seen. You can cite 1 CJ Ross or Byrd but it takes 3 judges. You guys never question or talk about the scoring method of the judges whom were not Ross or Byrd because it eliminates the agenda towards Canelo regarding scorecards.. lol
-
-
Comment
-
We all know the fights where Canelo got favorable cards. I've mentioned them in this thread as well.
Keep trying to change the discussion and move the goalposts though lol.
I guess that's all you can do when you're trying to take the indefensible position that 'all Canelo fights are legit and he never gets favorable cards' lolololol
What world do you guys live inComment
-
Again. Boxing has 3 judges. Citing CJ Ross even for a Draw means nothing when two other judges assured Floyd won. That’s the point of 3 judges. You’re not even consistent with “bias” since Byrd had Khan beating Canelo and CJ Ross never judged again. So you guys expose yourselves lolComment
-
Yes. It means a whole hell of a lot. When 1 judge turns in a corrupt scorecard, it means that there's an increased likelihood that the other judges are biased as well since you know for a fact the promoter may have been paying off the first judge, or that the first judge was unfairly biased towards Canelo Alvarez. This is a fact. The wins over Trout and Lara should be turned into No Contests because it's obvious Stanely Christodulu and Levi Martinez were corrupt.
For all we know, the judges even in the second GGG fight were paid off to score it for Canelo. And why would this surprise you? A loss to Glolovkin, even a 7-5 loss, would have meant that Canelo was just a drug cheat that was no longer marketable the way he was before. But a WIN, which just involves a judge giving 2 extra rounds to Canelo than they would have if they'd scored it 7-5 for GGG, a mere 2 rounds now turns Canelo from a disgraced drug cheat into the biggest global icon in sports. You cannot deny this. It was rewarded with a $400 million contract from DAZN. So Oscar may have told these judges give that fight to Canelo and we'll give you 1% of that money. 1% is nothing at all to Canelo, but to the judges, that's millions of dollars.
Citing CJ Ross for a fight that Floyd won is proof that evidences a pattern of corrupt scorecards in every Canelo Alvarez fight. Even though Floyd won, it makes the odds higher than team Canelo and the judges are doing illegal maneuvers.Comment
-
When did Canelo get a favorable decision that he clearly should have lost instead? It's hilarious seeing the responses from you guys because you can't answer a simple question.
It all boils down to just 2 boxers, Lara and Golovkin. (And among the lunatic fringe possibly Austin Trout, even though Canelo dropped his ass.) That's what all this crying and whining is about.
2 freaking guys in fights that were close and could have gone either way. That's pathetic, but when people are dead set on hating someone there's no stopping their emotional menstruation I guess.
If Billy Joe Saunders can clearly beat Canelo then he will win on the cards. I don't expect a blatant robbery since there has never been one in Canelo's entire career.Comment
-
Has Saunders the power to stop him?
No.
So, pointless fight, we know the winner.Comment
-
Saunders has the skills to survive 12 rounds vs Alvarez and that's it.
Canelo by UD in a snooze fest.Comment
Comment