Furys already better than Tyson(whos great cause size alone) after AJ ko he'll be top 5 atg hw

[Marchegiano]

1st off I think your assessment is way off as far as who would beat Fury,but you are also conflating what I'm saying as meaning Fury would beat everyone besides 5 boxers all time(I'm not saying that)

what I am saying is that Fury will have accomplished enough that it would be a top 5 all time heavyweight (who would be a test for anyone of any era,ali was tiny af compared to him, Foreman was slow but would be among the few I'd pick to beat Fury)

He has technically unified hw by winning all 4 belts,& if he kos AJ as I expect he'll be completely unified Undefeated heavyweight champ that is miles above everyone & has no peers(& contrary to whats claimed,this era has very difficult fighters that can hang with other eras,because these hws are enormous & have the best conditioning & nutrition.

Rather than argue I'm just going to give you another reason to like Fury over the past:

Much can be said about the global reach of boxing today vs the past eras. There's never been a more global world champion before the contemporary world champions. Well, outside of like the last generation! Floyd and Pac are truly global. I'm not sure the same should be said about Lamotta and Robinson. Likewise, the HWs are in the same boat.

[thetruthteller]

0 title defenses
steroid cheat
1 win in the current top 20
Currently running from a trilogy fight while fat

Yeah, he sounds like the best ever...

[billeau2]

Fury has 2 very impressive wins, but I'd like to see him defend his belt against a top contender 5-10 times as well before putting him up there. A lot of great champions lost to an underdog once they had to do that and it's a tough test of just how great you are. The next Rahman or Douglas or Andy Ruiz is just around the corner

This is a valid point, and someone also mentioned that most of Fury's rise was against British competiton, as compared to Tyson, who never beat a fellow great, but had "thick" solid competition coming up to unify the titles.

Marchigiano also made the point that Wilder is an unknown in so far as evaluating his greatness... Will he be considered a great opponent down the line? or more like a great puncher who was feared, but dealt with in the ring. Obviously evaluating Wilder affects how we see Fury.

I interpret Kush King's challenge as asking "Is there a path for Fury to prove greatness?" I believe there is a path... Only time will tell