Since Margarito cheated..Do you still consider Cotto's record Undefeated?

[JAB5239]

and there aint no proof that he didnt use them either..if people wanna just assume u know u cant blame them..cause im assuming he DID. and people also have the right assume he did,and vote on the poll...works both ways.

Im a Cotto fan, but this logic makes no sense. If you think like this EVERY fight in history can be questioned.

[Bushidō]

Even though I think he cheated..he wasn't caught so we have to accept it as a loss for Cotto

[JAB5239]

You're taking the wrong approach on this. The burden of proof lies on the accuser. He probably used them, but there is no concrete evidence, so the loss stands.

....exactly....

[Puya]

No he isn't undefeated. I stil believe Clottey won that fight. Mosley could have been a draw even though I felt Cotto won by a round or two.
As for this thread I believe Margo cheated. There still isn't proof. But I also feel he fought the wrong fight and Margo may have just whooped him bad also. He was running from Margo all night. He also could have only used them for Mosley, because he hits harder than Cotto and has better stamina than Cotto. Might have tried to slow Mosley down.

I said he felt the heavy punches even while covering.

[SweetSci]

Just look at the Sig :-)

acheater is never caught on the first attempt, i feel Margacheeto used it even in the Kermit Cintron Fight :bukkake:

[Doctor_Tenma]

I just don't see how Cotto could have won that night. It had more to do with the game plan.

[D-Omonist]

I just don't see how Cotto could have won that night. It had more to do with the game plan.

Even though it is hard to say...I agree!!! He had a bad game plan.

[alza1988]

I am one that believes margos gloves were loaded, but since it wasn't proved he actually used it, but it sure the **** looks like he did, cuz nobody ever, ever messed up a very strong, durable Cotto THAT bad, my sig reflects my opinion...he record is questionable, Although in my mind i don't consider that win a loss, i have to be fair about posting re; the facts.

The fact is, imo, he is undeated, but in reality where we have no actual proof, i have put the ? mark next to the 1 loss. If only for the sake of fairness. I didn't vote either cuz that option isn't there.

How can you trust a cheat he's obviously gonnae lie as good as he is at cheating .The reason I don't like Margarito is because most fighters are never the same after losing like that .
https://<object width="425" height="...mbed></object>

[flyest1]

I wish Hardcore Cotto fans can forget about this. The reason is because Margo got the beating of his life from Mosley. Plus Cotto is in a mega fight with Pac. Margo can't do **** and will probably never fight an elite again. If Margo never got caught, he could've been fighting Pac next.

[goblin]

You're taking the wrong approach on this. The burden of proof lies on the accuser. He probably used them, but there is no concrete evidence, so the loss stands.

no im actually taking the perfect approach on this..if he [marg] got caught.. SURE its just an ASSUMPTION...in not denying that at all..what u need to understand and simply accept that, that has a DAMN GOOD chance in being a fact..no there isnt no concrete evidence but "assuming he did in other matches" is an idea now that EVERYONE is approaching..