Please answer with all hate aside.

[Spacey1991]

They don't particularly do it in the way of who beats who... they mainly do it in order of the better fighter in more than one way, in terms of skill, dominance, achievements, etc. So Floyd is easily, probably top 10 most talented fighters of all time... but he can't suddenly be put there because he has yet to prove it... its about what you achieved, resume, talent, dominance, etc.

[studentofthegam]

No way of knowing who would win. At this point I would not rate Mayweather over any of them based on career numbers. All three deserve to be ranked high. Especially Pep who can make a case for top 1-3.

Im not talking about numbers. Im talkin bout ass whoopededness.

Let me just say this one thing. You think it was pushing it that Mayweather moved up from SFW or 130 and then beat an old, close to shot Oscar and a bad champ in Judah and Baldomir at WW?

Do you even realise that Duran started at what would be Super Bantamweight or 118, moved up and beat Ernesto Marcel, then won the lightweight title and unified against HOfer Ken Buchanan, then jumped 140 and moved straight to WW to fight one of the top three ATG WW's in Leonard and beat him? A guy that was much bigger and much younger? How does that compare to what Maywether did? It doesn't. Duran stomps those accomplishments.

Not a resume conversation. Not comparing just giving proper credit.

Maybe you can just update this list :

In 2002, Ring Magazine published a list of the 80 Best Fighters of the Last 80 Years in boxing, as voted by the magazine's writers.

Sugar Ray Robinson
Henry Armstrong
Muhammad Ali
Joe Louis
Roberto Duran
Willie Pep
Harry Greb
Benny Leonard
Sugar Ray Leonard
Pernell Whitaker
Carlos Monzon
Rocky Marciano
Ezzard Charles
Archie Moore
Sandy Saddler
Jack Dempsey
Marvin Hagler
Julio Cesar Chavez
Eder Jofre
Alexis Arguello
Barney Ross
Evander Holyfield
Ike Williams
Salvador Sanchez
George Foreman
Kid Gavilan
Larry Holmes
Mickey Walker
Ruben Olivares
Gene Tunney
**** Tiger
Fighting Harada
Emile Griffith
Tony Canzoneri
Aaron Pryor
Pascual Perez
Miguel Canto
Manuel Ortiz
Charley Burley
Carmen Basilio
Michael Spinks
Joe Frazier
Khaosai Galaxy
Roy Jones, Jr.
Tiger Flowers
Panama Al Brown
Kid Chocolate
Joe Brown
Tommy Loughran
Bernard Hopkins
Felix Trinidad
Jake LaMotta
Lennox Lewis
Wilfredo Gomez
Bob Foster
Jose Napoles
Billy Conn
Jimmy McLarnin
Pancho Villa
Carlos Ortiz
Bob Montgomery
Freddie Miller
Benny Lynch
Beau Jack
Azumah Nelson
Eusebio Pedroza
Thomas Hearns
Wilfred Benitez
Antonio Cervantes
Ricardo Lopez
Sonny Liston
Mike Tyson
Vicente Saldivar
Gene Fullmer
Oscar De La Hoya
Carlos Zarate
Marcel Cerdan
Flash Elorde
Mike McCallum
Harold Johnson

So can PBF even best Marvin Hagler in this list?

First of all he would beat Arguello and Trinidad to a pulp. And who the **** is Harold johnson? Do you even know? Put your list up damn thief.

[goblin213]

Mayweather is one of the best fighters I've ever seen step in the ring. But as much as I like Floyd I won't deny that his resume sucks for a fighter of his caliber. I wouldn't say he'll mop the floor with those fighters in fact I think he'll struggle with them but I still see him winning.

[goblin213]

Wow you don't know who Harold Johnson is? Man you need to look him up because he is one of the best technicians ever! Think of Ricardo Lopez as a lightheavy weight.

[BigStereotype]

Pep: No. Pep was basically a "Super-Mayweather." UD 15.
Chavez: Maybe, but I don't think so. This fight happens at 135 and we saw what happened when Castillo got to him. Chavez was Castillo but better. SD 12, Floyd could maybe win the rematch.
Duran: At 135, Duran wins. Mayweather's got a shot, but I'd definitely pick Duran. At 147, Mayweather wins hands down.

[ModernTalking]

all hate aside

[llamas1]

No hate at all but you cant get Floyd to fight the best we have currently. Had they been in the same generation Floyd would be making excuses about something.....

Duran and Chavez would beat him silly.... OMG. can you imagine the trash talking between Duran and Mayweather???

[Steak]

Mayweather would dominantly embarress all three. Chavez was another Baldomir, but smaller. Duran would have lost exactly the way Hatton did, they were mirror images. Pep was just another infighter, didnt you guys watch him fight Jesus Chavez?

based on Mayweather's fight against Henry Brussels(who was better than all three of them), he would slaughter all three.

[goblin213]

Mayweather would dominantly embarress all three. Chavez was another Baldomir, but smaller. Duran would have lost exactly the way Hatton did, they were mirror images. Pep was just another infighter, didnt you guys watch him fight Jesus Chavez?

based on Mayweather's fight against Henry Brussels(who was better than all three of them), he would slaughter all three.

Duran is just another Hatton? Are you fcking kidding me he is one of the best defensive/offensive fighter of all time. I never understand how people can see how defensively gifted Mayweather is and not Roberto Duran. Even Sugar Ray Leonard who has one of the fastest hands said Duran is so hard to hit. Duran works you on the inside like Andre Ward, he doesn't just hug. Hatton on the other hand is a bum.

[| THE KING |]

Mop the floor? really?