Originally posted by GetSumBrah
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pac wants to contest Cotto’s title/ Cotto insists that it should be a Non Title!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Makavelli View PostJabs, my man, let me get your thoughts about the credibility of the division
let's say the fight eventually becomes non-title bout even if its in within the welter limits....the fight goes on and Cotto proceeds to lose
how credible would it be for the '47 division to have a title holder that just lost? lost within the limits of the division against a smaller fighter
That is the biggest problem with catchweights and why I don't like them. ANY title fight should be held within the total limits of the division. If Cotto lost it would look bad of course. But if he is forced to put that title on the line without being given the whole scope of the division, Pacquiao's victory is tainted. I think Pac is going to beat him, I just think it should be done fairly. 145 is not the limit no matter how you look at it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
That is the biggest problem with catchweights and why I don't like them. ANY title fight should be held within the total limits of the division. If Cotto lost it would look bad of course. But if he is forced to put that title on the line without being given the whole scope of the division, Pacquiao's victory is tainted. I think Pac is going to beat him, I just think it should be done fairly. 145 is not the limit no matter how you look at it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mikelovesfood View Postyou can try to justify your point all you want, but if cotto loses and retains the belt he'll be the biggest ass in the boxing world.
Fair enough. But if Pac wins it with a new weight limit that Cotto was forced to put the title on the line, there should be an asterisk in the record books.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Makavelli View PostJabs, my man, let me get your thoughts about the credibility of the division
let's say the fight eventually becomes non-title bout even if its in within the welter limits....the fight goes on and Cotto proceeds to lose
how credible would it be for the '47 division to have a title holder that just lost? lost within the limits of the division against a smaller fighter
I don't mind 45' as long as its just a showcase fight. But if he wants to fight for the title then Cotto must be allowed to make the 47' limit.
45' null and voids the title because Cotto isn't allowed to make the weight he won his title at.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
Fair enough. But if Pac wins it with a new weight limit that Cotto was forced to put the title on the line, there should be an asterisk in the record books.
if anyone being forced pac was. arums bonus check makes it evident.
the biggest blunder was not putting the belt up for grabs somewhere along the fine print.
Comment
-
I think Cotto just want more from the cut. If WBO sanctions it, Cotto will have to pay 3% from his cut. Maybe if the Arum pays it, that`s what they want.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dominicano Soy! View PostWhy doesn't the man grow bigger balls under that baby carrot and face Cotto at the WW limit of 147. I ask you...
the fans,team cotto have to sacrifice 2lbs to make this fight. i think the trade-off is justified.
Comment
Comment