Calzaghe on Cleverly: "There is Only One of Me"

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Stickman
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2005
    • 3318
    • 160
    • 63
    • 9,835

    #41
    Originally posted by GetSumBrah
    the brits are the only one that truly overrated lacy. before & after the fact. how can a guy who had 22 or 23 fights & didnt face a great fighter get so much publicity before & after a loss.

    they continue to overrate the guy to make calzaghe's win against him look better.

    39 & 43 years old. that's what calzaghe is gonna be remebered as. Not to mention the fact that he got dropped by both 39 & 43 year old washed up legends who in turn slapped his way to a uanimous decision when both "alleged not as washed up or over the hill fighters" gassed starting in the middle rounds.

    clearly indicating a still in their prime figthers.

    doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure out what would have happend if calzaghe faced both guys in their 20s early 30s.
    No, buddy. Everybody, including about 85% of the people on this forum, had picked Lacy for a KO win over Calzaghe. The betting odds were something like 4/6 with Lacy as the favorite, and even the vast majority of the boxing "experts", both here at Boxingscene and the guys on ESPN, ShoBox and HBO were picking Lacy for a late KO win, or at the very least, a smooth decision victory. Seems like the oddsmakers were overrating Lacy the least, if you go back and read some of the outrageous statements made by people about how badly Lacy was going to pound Calzaghe. WIth the overwhelming majority picking Lacy to win, I"m surprised the odds weren't 5/1 against Calzaghe. I didn't put money on it myself, simply because I don't like to bet unless I can get 3 or 4/1 odds....a waste of time otherwise.

    If you think the English have overrated Lacy, both before and after the fight, it's probably because Americans presented him as the best we had to offer at the time (which he was, albeit inexperienced). I think about the only person who didn't overrated Lacy, was Calzaghe. And even though I had picked Calzaghe to win, I'm guilty of overrating Lacy myself, because I had no clue Joe would humiliate him to the extent he did. I figured Joe for a decision, with some rounds going to both fighters until Calzaghe swept the last 4 or 5 rounds. I never expected a total shutout, or thought I'd see Lacy crumble like he did. Thought it would be far more competetive.

    Anyway, back to my point: We (Americans) are far more guilty of overrating Lacy than the British. And the real hell of it is, we didn't really overrate Lacy to that great of an extent, but rather we dramatically underrated Calzaghe.

    I don't give a **** what anybody says...anyone that can beat Lacy and Kessler as easily as Calzaghe did is anything but a feather fisted bum, and to even suggest otherwise just reeks of sour g****s, or limited knowledge of the sport. Or both.

    Love him or hate him (Calzaghe), you have to admit he was extremely impressive against Lacy, Kessler, Hopkins and yes, even Jones. He was considered the underdog coming in against all 4 of these (though barely, against Jones, but even so....over half the people on this forum had picked Jones to win), and with the exception of Hopkins (who is a spoiler, has been for a long time, and nearly impossible to look good against), beat them all in impressive fashion.

    Yes, he could've come to America and fought the top guys sooner, but to be honest, many people don't really feel that America is the "home" of the sport of Boxing, but rather feel that the EU is where they should be fighting. And to be fair, when was the last time you even heard of 60,000 attending a fight at MSG? Hell, I dont' even think they have the seating for a third of that. But they see numbers like that in Germany for a Klitschko fight, and the Kessler/Calzaghe fight drew pretty damned good, too. It was in Cardiff Wales, and I remember someone saying on fight night that there were 40,000+ in the crowd. So maybe we think the boxing in the US is second to none, but they seem to have many more fans across the pond, and a greater earning potential, especially from the gate. And their fans seem to be more loyal than those in the US, too....Thousands of them follow their fighters to the US to watch them fight. Remember the Hatton and Calzaghe crowds in the stands making such a racket?

    You guys should maybe consider not trashing every fighter who didn't run his career/life just the way you think he should've, and maybe just accept their matchups, wins and losses as they are and be happy. I've seen more juvenlistic **** here on this forum than one would expect to see in a goddamn 3 grader playground. Grow the hell up, all of you, and act yer farking age.

    Comment

    • Manny Duckman
      Banned
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Jul 2009
      • 614
      • 49
      • 9
      • 713

      #42
      Exactly who has Lacy beaten to be such a great win??? I await the answer

      Comment

      • Abstraction
        Observer
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Sep 2007
        • 2083
        • 163
        • 68
        • 8,501

        #43
        His best and only big win was against Kessler.

        It was his only Prime v Prime bout against a World Class/Euro Class opponent (Not Elite).

        The rest of his wins leave a big question mark

        Comment

        • toysale
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Jan 2009
          • 726
          • 14
          • 0
          • 6,842

          #44
          Originally posted by Stickman
          No, buddy. Everybody, including about 85% of the people on this forum, had picked Lacy for a KO win over Calzaghe. The betting odds were something like 4/6 with Lacy as the favorite, and even the vast majority of the boxing "experts", both here at Boxingscene and the guys on ESPN, ShoBox and HBO were picking Lacy for a late KO win, or at the very least, a smooth decision victory. Seems like the oddsmakers were overrating Lacy the least, if you go back and read some of the outrageous statements made by people about how badly Lacy was going to pound Calzaghe. WIth the overwhelming majority picking Lacy to win, I"m surprised the odds weren't 5/1 against Calzaghe. I didn't put money on it myself, simply because I don't like to bet unless I can get 3 or 4/1 odds....a waste of time otherwise.

          If you think the English have overrated Lacy, both before and after the fight, it's probably because Americans presented him as the best we had to offer at the time (which he was, albeit inexperienced). I think about the only person who didn't overrated Lacy, was Calzaghe. And even though I had picked Calzaghe to win, I'm guilty of overrating Lacy myself, because I had no clue Joe would humiliate him to the extent he did. I figured Joe for a decision, with some rounds going to both fighters until Calzaghe swept the last 4 or 5 rounds. I never expected a total shutout, or thought I'd see Lacy crumble like he did. Thought it would be far more competetive.

          Anyway, back to my point: We (Americans) are far more guilty of overrating Lacy than the British. And the real hell of it is, we didn't really overrate Lacy to that great of an extent, but rather we dramatically underrated Calzaghe.

          I don't give a **** what anybody says...anyone that can beat Lacy and Kessler as easily as Calzaghe did is anything but a feather fisted bum, and to even suggest otherwise just reeks of sour g****s, or limited knowledge of the sport. Or both.

          Love him or hate him (Calzaghe), you have to admit he was extremely impressive against Lacy, Kessler, Hopkins and yes, even Jones. He was considered the underdog coming in against all 4 of these (though barely, against Jones, but even so....over half the people on this forum had picked Jones to win), and with the exception of Hopkins (who is a spoiler, has been for a long time, and nearly impossible to look good against), beat them all in impressive fashion.

          Yes, he could've come to America and fought the top guys sooner, but to be honest, many people don't really feel that America is the "home" of the sport of Boxing, but rather feel that the EU is where they should be fighting. And to be fair, when was the last time you even heard of 60,000 attending a fight at MSG? Hell, I dont' even think they have the seating for a third of that. But they see numbers like that in Germany for a Klitschko fight, and the Kessler/Calzaghe fight drew pretty damned good, too. It was in Cardiff Wales, and I remember someone saying on fight night that there were 40,000+ in the crowd. So maybe we think the boxing in the US is second to none, but they seem to have many more fans across the pond, and a greater earning potential, especially from the gate. And their fans seem to be more loyal than those in the US, too....Thousands of them follow their fighters to the US to watch them fight. Remember the Hatton and Calzaghe crowds in the stands making such a racket?

          You guys should maybe consider not trashing every fighter who didn't run his career/life just the way you think he should've, and maybe just accept their matchups, wins and losses as they are and be happy. I've seen more juvenlistic **** here on this forum than one would expect to see in a goddamn 3 grader playground. Grow the hell up, all of you, and act yer farking age.
          You are a legend! Did make me think how rarely a fighter from America ever travells into Europe if at all in their whole career. But all the same, legend.

          Comment

          • Stickman
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2005
            • 3318
            • 160
            • 63
            • 9,835

            #45
            How do you figure a question mark? Only one of his wins wasn't convincing (and no, it wasn't Hopkins. If you don't know who it was, you shouldn't be posting on this thread), the rest were either wide decisions, or KO's. And Kessler and other EU fighters aside, the beatdown he gave Lacy should've made a believer out of any American who isn't delusional.

            His best and only big win was against Kessler.

            It was his only Prime v Prime bout against a World Class/Euro Class opponent (Not Elite).

            The rest of his wins leave a big question mark

            Comment

            • Abstraction
              Observer
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Sep 2007
              • 2083
              • 163
              • 68
              • 8,501

              #46
              Originally posted by Stickman
              How do you figure a question mark? Only one of his wins wasn't convincing (and no, it wasn't Hopkins. If you don't know who it was, you shouldn't be posting on this thread), the rest were either wide decisions, or KO's. And Kessler and other EU fighters aside, the beatdown he gave Lacy should've made a believer out of any American who isn't delusional.
              I'm from UK, not US.

              Even i rate Hatton better than Joe.

              Although Hatton's resume is slightly questionable, it's normal considering others.

              But Joe's is just an engineered career.

              Comment

              • Stickman
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Feb 2005
                • 3318
                • 160
                • 63
                • 9,835

                #47
                Originally posted by minion
                I'm from UK, not US.

                Even i rate Hatton better than Joe.

                Although Hatton's resume is slightly questionable, it's normal considering others.

                But Joe's is just an engineered career.
                I remember some time ago looking back at Calzaghe's career, and most of his opponents were pretty well thought of at the time of his fights, many either unbeaten, or coming in with a loss or two. Engineered? I just don't see it. Not as exposed to worldwide competition as some fighters, maybe, but that doesn't necessarily make the competition less stiff, just not as widely known. And when he did step up against US fighters, the results were impressive in every case (Brewer, Mitchell, for example, both were favorites going in, if you remember).

                Again, not for me to tell a guy how he should run his career, or where/who/when he should fight. I can wish, but hey...wish in one hand, **** in the other, and see which fills up first.

                Comment

                • Ryn0
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 11139
                  • 310
                  • 269
                  • 20,767

                  #48
                  Originally posted by GetSumBrah
                  the brits are the only one that truly overrated lacy. before & after the fact. how can a guy who had 22 or 23 fights & didnt face a great fighter get so much publicity before & after a loss.

                  they continue to overrate the guy to make calzaghe's win against him look better.

                  39 & 43 years old. that's what calzaghe is gonna be remebered as. Not to mention the fact that he got dropped by both 39 & 43 year old washed up legends who in turn slapped his way to a uanimous decision when both "alleged not as washed up or over the hill fighters" gassed starting in the middle rounds.

                  clearly indicating a still in their prime figthers.

                  doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure out what would have happend if calzaghe faced both guys in their 20s early 30s.
                  Your ******ed, you clearly don't remember that far back. Go back a couple hundred pages of the forum, Lacy was the new "Tyson" they were saying the eventually Lacy and Taylor were going to become ATG's and have a showdown.

                  The entire board though Lacy was going to win, the American press and the British though Lacy was going to KO him. I thought Lacy was going to wipe him out within 6 rounds due to Joe's poor performances beforehand.

                  Comment

                  • vercingetorix3
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 1581
                    • 73
                    • 152
                    • 8,356

                    #49
                    Ugh, I thought the Calzaghe hate would have been over. Let the "Who has he beat?" and "All you Yanks suck" comments begin!

                    I'm not saying he faced the best opposition and his style was indeed...umm...awkward at best, but have any of you gone 45-0 and won multiple major world titles and generated millions of dollars and fought on HBO/Showtime? I think not.

                    Comment

                    • Gizzam
                      Banned
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Jul 2009
                      • 295
                      • 45
                      • 43
                      • 580

                      #50
                      This thread is too ad hominem for my tastes. Calzaghe was great, not a top 10 p4p all time but still a great fighter.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP