Being fluid is no virtue. And boxing is no gymnastics session. Fluidity is completely irrelevant.
You see, you state being "robotic is worse being fluid" yet these "robots" win and and the loosers lose.
Such statements like "I will never respect Wlad because he has worse footwork than Ali" or "Vit isn't as flexible as Byrd" are nonsense. There is not "Fluidity" on the scorecards, but there is KO on the scorecards. Thus if you compare Vit with Ali then compare their KOs and compare how dominant (= round winning) their victories were. I see no gift decisions for Vit in his career, as opposed to Ali.
There is no greater fluidity than winning.
Except for Ali's cruiser fights Ali was not fluid. Muhammad Ali was the Sam Peter of the 70ies. Actually Sam Peter is more fluid than Ali was. Watch his fights before making any "fluidity statement about Ali".
You see, you state being "robotic is worse being fluid" yet these "robots" win and and the loosers lose.
Such statements like "I will never respect Wlad because he has worse footwork than Ali" or "Vit isn't as flexible as Byrd" are nonsense. There is not "Fluidity" on the scorecards, but there is KO on the scorecards. Thus if you compare Vit with Ali then compare their KOs and compare how dominant (= round winning) their victories were. I see no gift decisions for Vit in his career, as opposed to Ali.
There is no greater fluidity than winning.
Except for Ali's cruiser fights Ali was not fluid. Muhammad Ali was the Sam Peter of the 70ies. Actually Sam Peter is more fluid than Ali was. Watch his fights before making any "fluidity statement about Ali".
Comment