If Mayweather >'s Marquez will he be #1 P4P Poll?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DrewWoodside
    Lifestyle..Regular!
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jan 2008
    • 9244
    • 317
    • 590
    • 16,453

    #21
    Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
    Very true, we have one guy who started at 126, another who started at 130. WWs don't come into the ring weighing 147/148, Jr WWs, the mismath isn't in the size, P4P I'd still call this a mismatch, Mayweather in my opinion, is just levels ahead of JMM, overall better in every department.
    I'd like to hear some opinions from NSB regulars.. LarrySmith, Pink, Mangler, Reed, Tunney, Anorak perhaps? Although I don't ever hear Anorak posting on Mayweather threads..

    Comment

    • brick wall
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Feb 2008
      • 6480
      • 259
      • 35
      • 24,574

      #22
      Originally posted by DrewWoodside
      I don't think it should give him #1 spot but suppose Mayweather beat Marquez then Mosley, and Pacquiao remained inactive. I'm sure that would guarantee him the #1 spot. Which is why I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of fans are calling for him to be ranked #1 if he wins. Boxing fans always(and sometimes only) remember the last fight they saw.
      that's a lot of speculations and too much of it is bad for your health
      seriously, if you can't get real at least get close to it. you started it good when you concentrated on their next fight but beyond that is just absurd.

      Comment

      • BattlingNelson
        Mod a Phukka
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2008
        • 29840
        • 3,246
        • 3,191
        • 286,536

        #23
        Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
        I can see you didn't read my 1st post. What I meant was, what "Huge Weight Disadvantage?".
        My bad. I did actually, but clicked the poll afterwards and forgot your post.

        Do I need to explain the weight issue? I'm sure you know.

        Comment

        • Doctor_Tenma
          Monster
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Apr 2009
          • 33313
          • 1,327
          • 1,249
          • 58,127

          #24
          Originally posted by DrewWoodside
          I'd like to hear some opinions from NSB regulars.. LarrySmith, Pink, Mangler, Reed, Tunney, Anorak perhaps? Although I don't ever hear Anorak posting on Mayweather threads..
          Tunney doesn't like Mayweather. He even said Mayweather hasn't faced bigger opponents, only DLH

          Comment

          • Doctor_Tenma
            Monster
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2009
            • 33313
            • 1,327
            • 1,249
            • 58,127

            #25
            Originally posted by BattlingNelson
            My bad. I did actually, but clicked the poll afterwards and forgot your post.

            Do I need to explain the weight issue? I'm sure you know.
            What is it about 4-5 lbs, that makes it a "Huge Weight Disadvantage"?

            Comment

            • DrewWoodside
              Lifestyle..Regular!
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jan 2008
              • 9244
              • 317
              • 590
              • 16,453

              #26
              Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
              What is it about 4-5 lbs, that makes it a "Huge Weight Disadvantage"?
              At that the smaller sizes, smaller weight differences are considered proportionately larger. At some of the very low weight classes a weight class can be determined by just a couple lbs.. Either way have to just let the folks at Ring flip a coin so we can all argue about it later.

              Comment

              • Doctor_Tenma
                Monster
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2009
                • 33313
                • 1,327
                • 1,249
                • 58,127

                #27
                Originally posted by DrewWoodside
                At that the smaller sizes, smaller weight differences are considered proportionately larger. At some of the very low weight classes a weight class can be determined by just a couple lbs.. Either way have to just let the folks at Ring flip a coin so we can all argue about it later.
                There is a size difference between the two, not a huge one.

                Comment

                • BattlingNelson
                  Mod a Phukka
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2008
                  • 29840
                  • 3,246
                  • 3,191
                  • 286,536

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
                  What is it about 4-5 lbs, that makes it a "Huge Weight Disadvantage"?
                  Floyd is a full blown welter and JMM was a superfeather untill september last year. It's like Floyd fighting Pavlik.

                  Comment

                  • Doctor_Tenma
                    Monster
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2009
                    • 33313
                    • 1,327
                    • 1,249
                    • 58,127

                    #29
                    Originally posted by BattlingNelson
                    Floyd is a full blown welter and JMM was a superfeather untill september last year. It's like Floyd fighting Pavlik.
                    Floyd fighting Pavlik? Go see the eye doctor, please!

                    Comment

                    • BattlingNelson
                      Mod a Phukka
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Mar 2008
                      • 29840
                      • 3,246
                      • 3,191
                      • 286,536

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
                      Floyd fighting Pavlik? Go see the eye doctor, please!
                      Did you fail math?

                      160-147=13
                      147-135=12

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP