Did you know that CALZAGHE beat CHRIS BYRD in amateurs?

[dde91]

yes........if you have a wbo belt it must mean your defenses are weaker than if you had an ibf belt.

what a dumb fuck you are.

with that ****** ass way of looking at things joppy and holmes were better than hopkins before the tournament.

they had the wbc and wba not the crappy ibf.

Your an Idiot. The IBF is up there with The WBA and WBC. Nobody really gives a **** about the WBO belt unless your a european. The IBF has made itself a MAJOR belt within the last 20 year. Only an idiot like you would compare the WBO to the IBF.

[dde91]

Problem is that CALZAGHE is not american.
If he was american he would be probably TOP 10 ATG of all time!

If he was American, He wouldn't Be Undefeated. Easy as that.

[TonyJ]

What a ****** comment from a very ****** guy.
Calzaghe wasn't a big name in the US, thats for sure. But he had some decent wins over Woodhall or Brewer. But this is not the point.
It's about the money. Hopkins purse against Daniels were peanuts, and the 3M $ would have been a career high-payday (including the Tito-fight), wo why not take the fight?? In these times Calzaghe-Hopkins would not sell 20tickets on American soil because Hopkins was never a draw.
Tszyu went to the UK for the Hatton fight, because if it makes money if makes sense.
All in al it is delusional to say Calzaghe ducked Hopkins.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

If he was American, He wouldn't Be Undefeated. Easy as that.

Cos Yanks are ****

[DuttyAlacrity]

Martin Castillo beat Floyd Mayweather as amateurs. Floyd must be a **** fighter.

fricking HILARIOUS!

[WhoreUs]

Your an Idiot. The IBF is up there with The WBA and WBC. Nobody really gives a **** about the WBO belt unless your a european. The IBF has made itself a MAJOR belt within the last 20 year. Only an idiot like you would compare the WBO to the IBF.

blah blah blah

the belt doesn't have anything to do with a person's defenses.

you talk as if just because a guy is defending an ibf belt it's automatically better than defenses of the wbo belt.

so when barrera had a wbo belt......when hamed had a wbo belt.......when tapia had a wbo belt......when cotto had the wbo belt......when freitas had a wbo belt........they had weaker defenses than the guys with the ibf belt?

stfu

[dde91]

blah blah blah

the belt doesn't have anything to do with a person's defenses.

you talk as if just because a guy is defending an ibf belt it's automatically better than defenses of the wbo belt.

so when barrera had a wbo belt......when hamed had a wbo belt.......when tapia had a wbo belt......when cotto had the wbo belt......when freitas had a wbo belt........they had weaker defenses than the guys with the ibf belt?

stfu

But all of those fighters you just named did just keep that belt for ten years and do **** about unifying. they went after big names to get other belts or to make their legacy better.