I'm a bigger Barrera and Morales fan than you are, Gringo. Learn how to speak spanish first.
see how you just come back with ****** and pointless ****? thats called ownage, you aint a fan of nobody but pacquiao you ****** nuthugger now go eat your ***en hot dog
see how you just come back with ****** and pointless ****? thats called ownage, you aint a fan of nobody but pacquiao you ****** nuthugger now go eat your ***en hot dog
^^^^^^This guy fronts like he is a boxing fan. He represents his race like them quitters represent him. hahahaha!
see how you just come back with ****** and pointless ****? thats called ownage, you aint a fan of nobody but pacquiao you ****** nuthugger now go eat your ***en hot dog
After you mow the lawn then prepare the hotdogs for us to eat.
wrong. For you to tell us most boxing experts would agree they are even without pointing out any evidence that supports this makes it a flawed point. If youre not going by P4P lists or articles or anything, youre ASSUMING they are. I counterargued that experts do not believe going off by P4P rankings and general consensus.
I can tell you "Most boxing experts have Manny over JMM at this point" would have more truth in the statement than yours above. I can back that up with rankings, articles, etc. Thus making your claim false.
Its also funny how you add more fluff to each arguement. I keep things out that have no relevance.
Again, making false claims. I've never said D Diaz > J Diaz. I simply said Manny has a better resume with the likes of Morales, nonshot Barrera, Hatton, JMM ODLH Vs JMM's of Casamayor, J Diaz, shot Barrera, Loss to Chris John, Loss to Manny. You seem to hold J Diaz and Casamayor in an unusual high regard.
Again, youre only counting the past year as a method of their rankings being even rather than judging them as a whole. I still have no idea why you would disregard every year prior to 08, maybe just to glorify JMM that much more. Another bad arguement.
Its funny how you add these little personal attacks, but at the same time churning out wrong info. Maybe you should concern yourself of actually trying to cement your arguement with truth rather than bragging about your self proclaimed intelligence and remember youre just on a boxing forum. quoting such words as "bull****" "weak" as an insult to me doesnt increase your self-observed high level of class. Little did I know there were rules of "internet Etiquette". I for one believe that would be actions of a douchebag.
I never bragged about anything, and I'm not talking about etiquette. Of course it's a boxing forum and we can use whatever kind of language we want. But once you say you're going to point out flaws in an argument, you need to use rules of logical reasoning. Name calling is fallacy. It's too easy to dismiss something as "bull****" and just move on. In this case it has nothing to do with class.
Comment