Bernard is a great but overrated (Lost all legacy fights)

[Tyson2k7]

Roy Jones Jr
Jermain Taylor 2 Times
Joe Calzaghe

These where the big ones for Bernard and he failed. Now i won't **** on him for losing to the versions of the fighters when he fought them. A lot of fighters would have lost to those 3 fighters at the time when he faced them.

Still Hopkins = 0-4 in his legacy fights.

[Grimmer]

De La Hoya
Tarver
Winky
Tito
Pavlik

[Mr.Fantastic]

De La Hoya
Tarver
Winky
Tito
Pavlik

4 out of 5 being blown up dudes. Way to go Hopkins!!

[The Drogba]

He beat Calzaghe and Taylor x2 IMO without a doubt.

[-EX-]

So owning Trinidad meant nothing?
20 Title Defenses aren't part of a legacy?
Only man to KO Oscar De La Hoya(well really KO)
His Glory Past 40?
Never lost in his prime...
Winning fights he was supposed to lose countless amounts of times...

Get the hell outta here...

[oside4life]

he beat taylor the first time period. and the second was closer but bhop won that too. Taylor won cause thats what hbo wanted

[street bully]

He beat Calzaghe and Taylor x2 IMO without a doubt.

For the first time I agree with you flawless.

[K-Nan]

His two greatest wins (Tarver and Pavlik) came at the tail end of his career. A mix of a "nothing to lose" approach in which he took more risks and the fact that he'd picked up a few tricks along the way.

[-EX-]

4 out of 5 being blown up dudes. Way to go Hopkins!!

Tito was a champion at 160 so don't bring up the weight bull****
The way he beat Pavlik that weight wouldn't have meant ****

You can say wat u want about the Winky fight. B-Hop hit em and clinched all night. Like he said before the fight Winky had ****ty legs. And Winky walks around even heavier than 170 between fights...

[-EX-]

His two greatest wins (Tarver and Pavlik) came at the tail end of his career. A mix of a "nothing to lose" approach in which he took more risks and the fact that he'd picked up a few tricks along the way.

You wouldn't put the Trinidad win above the Tarver win?