marvin hagler vs bernard hopkins in middleweight
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
...most of hagler's big $ wins came against hearns, duran, mugabi, but if you do your homework, you'll see that hagler's reign over 160 came at a time when 160 was one of the deepest divisions in boxing...above that, hearns, duran, srl, were successful at 160 and divisions higherComment
-
Comment
-
No he would not. Listen man who the hell has Kessler beat that comes even close to Tarver? Andrate? Mundine? Kessler is so overrated it isn't even funny.
Also youthink Tarver was fat? Lmao.and the Tarver Hopkins fought was the Tarver that just destroyed Roy Jones, in 2 rounds who arguably never lost, while Calzaghe couldn't beat him without almost getting Koed himself 4 years and two KO losses later.Last edited by street bully; 07-07-2009, 11:27 AM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Duran was successful above 160? Leonard? Oh right...Lalonde (rolls eyes)....most of hagler's big $ wins came against hearns, duran, mugabi, but if you do your homework, you'll see that hagler's reign over 160 came at a time when 160 was one of the deepest divisions in boxing...above that, hearns, duran, srl, were successful at 160 and divisions higher
Yeah, Hagler's biggest wins came against smaller guys - he had quite an impressive reign, however, against some tough opposition but...so did Hopkins.Comment
-
These guys no NOTHING about Tarver. Nada. And Tarver was the one guy I would've LOVED to have seen Calzaghe fight because he had that one-hitter quitter, unlike a Jones or Hopkins.Comment
Comment