Chambers looked good in his last fight, he was throwing some good combos and his upper body movement was good, I still think that Wlad will win by late KO but Chambers will have his moments especially if he can get inside.
Chambers looked good against an unexperienced Dimitrenko. But i noticed that he stood right infront on Dimitrenko all night and Dimitenko was backing up a lot. Wlad would not back up as much and he would have a field day with Chambers standing right in front of him.
Wlad by late stoppage.
Chambers looked good in his last fight, he was throwing some good combos and his upper body movement was good, I still think that Wlad will win by late KO but Chambers will have his moments especially if he can get inside.
Eddie is a very good old school fighter with fast hands, much better then chris byrd therfore he will put uo a much better fight then byrd did, but I want to see wlad go for the kill pretty early in this one when it happens, hes been boring lately and I feel he can take these guys out eralier then hes been doing
Eddie is a very good old school fighter with fast hands, much better then chris byrd therfore he will put uo a much better fight then byrd did, but I want to see wlad go for the kill pretty early in this one when it happens, hes been boring lately and I feel he can take these guys out eralier then hes been doing
I don't think it's fair to say Eddie is better than Byrd. Byrd was a helluva fighter who took some top scalps. Unless you're saying against Klit alone.
Klistchko was all wrong for Byrd from the start and when he fought him last, he was just way too old.
But don't kid yourself. Chambers resume is nowhere near where Byrd's was and Byrd fought some huge punchers (he both won and lost against massive punchers)
I don't think it's fair to say Eddie is better than Byrd. Byrd was a helluva fighter who took some top scalps. Unless you're saying against Klit alone.
Klistchko was all wrong for Byrd from the start and when he fought him last, he was just way too old.
But don't kid yourself. Chambers resume is nowhere near where Byrd's was and Byrd fought some huge punchers (he both won and lost against massive punchers)
They're both similar in that they're undersized heavyweights and both boxers, but that's what there similiarty ends. Chambers can handle being a heavyweight better than Byrd because Chambers has more pop in his punches and his style is based on not getting hit. Byrd should of never been a heavyweight, Byrd would probably of been an ATG had he fought at LHW or CW.
Last edited by Boxingwizard; 07-08-2009, 09:14 PM.
Comment