Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wladimir Klitschko vs. Eddie Chambers: who would win?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Stickman View Post
    I actually think this'll be a good fight for maybe 4 rounds. Eddie is hard to catch with anything but a jab, and he's slick enough, I think he'll be able to get inside a couple of times before Wlad finds out how to keep his range against this particular style. Eddie's problem is that he's got **** for power and in the past hasn't taken his training seriously. I've heard he was in much better shape this last time out (thank God), so he should make a bit of a fight of it for a few rounds, before getting caught with a few right hands and becoming too gunshy to try and land much. End of the 10th round stoppage by Eddie's corner, they will not let him answer the 11th round bell because he'll be down by 4 rounds and pretty beaten up with no hope of a win. Sounds familiar for some reason.
    Fair analysis. However, in my opinion Chambers is a more dynamic fighter than those with whom Wlad. has tangoed as of late. I believe that Eddie will show an ability to adapt in the ring and I don't think he will merely wilt under the pressure, as we've gotten use to Wlad's opponents doing.

    As you though I picked Wlad. by late KO. Still, I do think Chambers brings something extra to the table which makes him a very live underdog, despite the size discrepancy.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by tymann23 View Post
      something tells me chambers would take this..you can ridicule me and give me all the red k you want but there is something about eddie that tells me he will do it..i see him getting up from a knockdown to stop wladimir in the 8th round with his snapping right hand
      First let me say this: If you just have a "gut feeling", or can't come up with a concrete reason, based on a sound analysis, of why you think Eddie would manage to KO Klitschko, then just saying "Something tells me Eddie would take this" is sort of pointless.

      However, agree or disagree, however foolish I may think that opinion is, I wouldn't red K you just for having it. You pretty much have to be an extremely rude, obnoxious prick for me to do that to you, and even then, I usually only do it to retaliate when it's been done to me. Anybody that does that to you just for not sharing their opinion is a petty, childish, ****less, witless, thoughtless, cum-guzzling ass monkey.


      By the way, here's a little green k to help you out, not that the **** really matters much

      Comment


      • #23
        I don't think Wlad would stop Eddie, Eddie is no Tony Thompson or Chagiev. Ffs Wladomire couldn't stop Ibragomov.

        Comment


        • #24
          I think Chambers is a peice of ****, Dimintrenko fought like a poor mans danny williams.

          Wlad by Brutal ko

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Stickman View Post
            First let me say this: If you just have a "gut feeling", or can't come up with a concrete reason, based on a sound analysis, of why you think Eddie would manage to KO Klitschko, then just saying "Something tells me Eddie would take this" is sort of pointless.

            However, agree or disagree, however foolish I may think that opinion is, I wouldn't red K you just for having it. You pretty much have to be an extremely rude, obnoxious prick for me to do that to you, and even then, I usually only do it to retaliate when it's been done to me. Anybody that does that to you just for not sharing their opinion is a petty, childish, ****less, witless, thoughtless, cum-guzzling ass monkey.


            By the way, here's a little green k to help you out, not that the **** really matters much
            This statement has a terrific flow to it lol.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by Stickman View Post
              First let me say this: If you just have a "gut feeling", or can't come up with a concrete reason, based on a sound analysis, of why you think Eddie would manage to KO Klitschko, then just saying "Something tells me Eddie would take this" is sort of pointless.

              However, agree or disagree, however foolish I may think that opinion is, I wouldn't red K you just for having it. You pretty much have to be an extremely rude, obnoxious prick for me to do that to you, and even then, I usually only do it to retaliate when it's been done to me. Anybody that does that to you just for not sharing their opinion is a petty, childish, ****less, witless, thoughtless, cum-guzzling ass monkey.


              By the way, here's a little green k to help you out, not that the **** really matters much
              thanks for the green k. but i do have a somewhat sound analysis on why i thinkhe can KO klitschko..he slips punches really well and is good at getting on the inside against a bigger guy and his power is underrated..i dont think wladimir would be able to hug chambers like he does to all his other opponents and when eddie gets inside i see him raping wlad with uppercuts to the chin

              Comment


              • #27
                I'm quite certain Wlad would stop Chambers. I'm thinking it will come sometime from the 7th to the 9th round. I think Eddie has the defensive ability and chin to make it through the first six.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Eddie would get frustrated and then KO'd........Wlad is the BEST HW on the planet......hands down!!!......I got Wlad over Vitali also

                  happy 3500th to me!!!!

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Early KO. Eddie has done a great job, but Wlad is no Sascha Dimitrenko. He throws a rifle of a jab and a straight right that will go right through Eddies high guard. This will be an ugly four or five rounds before Eddie's sympathetic handlers throw in the towel.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Wlad dominates him and knocks him out in the 7th.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP