Both fight all out and I think cotto has a bit of a better defence JMM with the better chin but either way it's a walk in the park for Floyd. This is coming from a big Cotto fan. Floyd's defence is to good.
tougher matchup for Floyd, Cotto or JMM??
Collapse
-
******, cotto has acomplished more in his career than JMM. cotto is a better welterweight than floyd simply because cotto has beaten the very best, and FOUGHT the very best of the division:
on welter alone:
quintana
urkal
judah
gomez
mosley
margarito
clottey
WOW, now that is an outstanding resume and it
s just on 147! he defended his belt many times at 140! now dont come with that "vacant" belt bull**** because fact is he was supposed to fight champions many times but the politics that have ruined the sport got into the way! COTTO = better wins than floyd, plain and simple.
how many ring belts have cotto won?
how many divisions has cotto been in?
Who has won the most vacant titles in the modern era of boxing?
need i continue?Comment
-
Can you explain to me how stylistically Cotto is a tougher fight for Mayweather rather than JMM...
when stylistically JMM does everything better than Cotto..
thats all i want to know....
how does refurnishing boats make a good investment? your a ******.
Go to that thread...and figure it out
your just butthurt that cotto is going to steal floyd's glory by beating pacquiao first.Comment
-
I wounder why we didn't see---(Cotto has never had problems with defensive fighters,he has the power,he has the jab,size,counterpunching ability and everything else )--->all that against Clottey? A long night, Cotto has the stamina issure not Floyd. (Marathon) Wasn't that what Cotto doing in the Rito/Mosley/Clottey fight? Lol, you got to be kidding me, unless you was looking at a different Cotto fight. HmmmmmComment
-
Comment
-
Mayweather was retirement was based on the assumption that he didn't want to fight top welters years ago. Now on his comeback fight, he's fighting a natural featherweight so it's obvious which is the tougher fight. It doesn't mean that he would lose his O on one of the two it simply means that floyd himself is aware that top welters are tough fight so he'd rather fight at 154 or 143 rather than risk his O at 147 LOL.Comment
-
where is the thread starter....how is the thread starter stop posting in his thread...when questions need to be answered...
I just need for somebody to explain to me how stylistically Cotto is a tougher fight for Mayweather rather than JMM...
when stylistically JMM does everything better than Cotto!
Let me explain something to you since I assumed anyone with a brain would understand that easily Cotto is the harder matchup.
JMM a LIGHTWEIGHT is coming from 135, he's never even fought at 140, but he's going to fight Mayweather at 144? Right there is already an advantage for Floyd, who's last fights were at 147, 154. Who knows what itll be at fight night.
Cotto at 147 isnt a chump like you believe. Cotto only has 1 loss against Margarito, and alot of people are calling that loss an asterik.
Again, Cotto is 147. A Welterweight match. A fight at 147 is tougher than a catchweight 144 against the much smaller JMM. Stylistically it isnt going to matter, as JMM isnt worlds better than Cotto P4P, maybe just slightly.
not to Diss JMM, but he did lose to Chris John. How does that make him a much better fighter than Cotto? Especially in a straight up match. cotto nears in 160 fight night, JMM, 144 -146, TOPS. This isnt even mentioning how JMM gets knocked down by lower class weights and Cotto has a pretty good chin, at WELTERWEIGHT.
This shouldnt even be a debate. Look at the poll. I still cant believe anyone is actually trying to argue this.Comment
-
To Horus and others :
Cotto is the tougher fight, point blank. Why? Easy and simple as this.
Yes, JMM is P4P better than Cotto and skill-set probably tops Cotto. Horus says "OMGZ SKILLZ PAYZ BILLZ" yes Horus, skills pay bills - BUT Marquez's skill pays his bills in lower weight classes, SON. Cotto is in the weight-class Floyd is, and Cotto is still young.
Marquez is aged, and yes still a tough fighter but MOVING up in weight so late, so please explain to me how JMM is tougher than Cotto at this stage? JMM is unproven at 140+ and aged, so he has disadvantages down the list, alas Cotto is a champion at 147 and we seen what he can do.
I don't see how many can debate this, Cotto is tougher fight - anyone who disagrees needs to go back to common sense school.Comment
-
make no mistake, i think floyd beats anybody in this time and age, except paul williams because of the style but it just pisses me off that he has fought bums all along and just gotten infamous because of the money throwing persona. and still can't sell 3k tickets at the mgm grand. cotto fills out msg.Comment
-
stylistically? I asked who's a tougher matchup, not who's a better matchup style wise.
Let me explain something to you since I assumed anyone with a brain would understand that easily Cotto is the harder matchup.
JMM a LIGHTWEIGHT is coming from 135, he's never even fought at 140, but he's going to fight Mayweather at 144? Right there is already an advantage for Floyd, who's last fights were at 147, 154. Who knows what itll be at fight night.
Cotto at 147 isnt a chump like you believe. Cotto only has 1 loss against Margarito, and alot of people are calling that loss an asterik.
Again, Cotto is 147. A Welterweight match. A fight at 147 is tougher than a catchweight 144 against the much smaller JMM. Stylistically it isnt going to matter, as JMM isnt worlds better than Cotto P4P, maybe just slightly.
not to Diss JMM, but he did lose to Chris John. How does that make him a much better fighter than Cotto? Especially in a straight up match. cotto nears in 160 fight night, JMM, 144 -146, TOPS. This isnt even mentioning how JMM gets knocked down by lower class weights and Cotto has a pretty good chin, at WELTERWEIGHT.
This shouldnt even be a debate. Look at the poll. I still cant believe anyone is actually trying to argue this.Comment
Comment