About Floyd Mayweather...................

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Walt Liquor
    the opposite of pure
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2009
    • 21667
    • 913
    • 1,369
    • 40,313

    #61
    Originally posted by Pullcounter
    because floyd is the former #1 and if the current #1 (pac) loses and since JMM is the current #2, if floyd beats jmm it makes him instantly #1.

    that said, he still needs to fight mosley and/or cotto (should he beat pac).
    Your logic doesn't seem in line with what pfp means. Pfp isn't a division where you beat someone then you take their spot (to me). Pfp fighters IMO should be ranked on skills and what happens to them when they take the best available fights and challenge themselves. By your logic, if wlad were to heat pac, then he would be pfp. There are a number of fighters who have accomplished more than floyd lately, and him beating a guy coming up 2 weight classes isn't that impressive. Just like pavlik beating cotto wouldn't be that impressive.

    Comment

    • JAB5239
      Dallas Cowboys
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 27722
      • 5,036
      • 4,436
      • 73,018

      #62
      Originally posted by pbftxrs316
      end of discussion...let's see what he has to respond with...many people make that same claim....they favor floyd to beat fighter A or B or A and B, but then they say, he's ducking them...i have read many posts making the same claims...trust me...it's like they are really saying, what they blame floyd fans for claiming about floyd, how his skill is so good, that he would beat these fighters without even fighting them...it cracks me up...

      Just because one fighter may be favored to beat another, it shouldn't be a pass not to fight him. Seems most Floyd fans (not all) cannot grasp this basic concept.

      Comment

      • mickey malone
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 4409
        • 144
        • 101
        • 11,772

        #63
        MAYWEATHER + WANKERS = WEAK + WOMANLY= SADDO MOMMA'S BOYZ

        I could do a thread.... PBF Hampster dies...

        Majority of you PRICKS would respond to it... WHY? Cos the man aint interested..

        See you all on BOXING HISTORY.. (18)

        Sorry.... Forgot.... Most of you, can only name 2 fighters...

        PRICKS & WANKERS..

        Kiss my arse, DUMBFUX....

        Should get more attention than a Snuff Movie....x

        Comment

        • S.G.
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2008
          • 9412
          • 296
          • 635
          • 16,360

          #64
          Originally posted by mickey malone
          MAYWEATHER + WANKERS = WEAK + WOMANLY= SADDO MOMMA'S BOYZ

          I could do a thread.... PBF Hampster dies...

          Majority of you PRICKS would respond to it... WHY? Cos the man aint interested..

          See you all on BOXING HISTORY.. (18)

          Sorry.... Forgot.... Most of you, can only name 2 fighters...

          PRICKS & WANKERS..

          Kiss my arse, DUMBFUX....

          Should get more attention than a Snuff Movie....x
          Age: 45

          Comment

          • Pullcounter
            no guts no glory
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jan 2004
            • 42582
            • 549
            • 191
            • 49,739

            #65
            Originally posted by Walt Liquor
            Your logic doesn't seem in line with what pfp means. Pfp isn't a division where you beat someone then you take their spot (to me). Pfp fighters IMO should be ranked on skills and what happens to them when they take the best available fights and challenge themselves. By your logic, if wlad were to heat pac, then he would be pfp. There are a number of fighters who have accomplished more than floyd lately, and him beating a guy coming up 2 weight classes isn't that impressive. Just like pavlik beating cotto wouldn't be that impressive.
            no no no no no nono.

            that's not the logic at all.

            the logic is that pac has to lose to cotto for floyd to be #1, since floyd was the former #1.

            pac and floyd have to beat to see who is the real p4p king (depending on if pac beats cotto).

            Comment

            • mickey malone
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2009
              • 4409
              • 144
              • 101
              • 11,772

              #66
              Originally posted by S.G.
              Age: 45

              and a half...

              Comment

              • Walt Liquor
                the opposite of pure
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 21667
                • 913
                • 1,369
                • 40,313

                #67
                Originally posted by jantzen212003
                who? enlighten us with this one!
                You really need help with this?

                You don't know much about boxing huh?

                Comment

                • Walt Liquor
                  the opposite of pure
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 21667
                  • 913
                  • 1,369
                  • 40,313

                  #68
                  Originally posted by Pullcounter
                  no no no no no nono.

                  that's not the logic at all.

                  the logic is that pac has to lose to cotto for floyd to be #1, since floyd was the former #1.

                  pac and floyd have to beat to see who is the real p4p king (depending on if pac beats cotto).
                  Ok, we just disagree on pbf's pfp status. I don't think he's the second best fighter.

                  Comment

                  • Walt Liquor
                    the opposite of pure
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 21667
                    • 913
                    • 1,369
                    • 40,313

                    #69
                    Originally posted by Pullcounter
                    no no no no no nono.

                    that's not the logic at all.

                    the logic is that pac has to lose to cotto for floyd to be #1, since floyd was the former #1.

                    pac and floyd have to beat to see who is the real p4p king (depending on if pac beats cotto).
                    So we just disagree about floyds position pfp. If zab is ur best win in 7 yrs. Ur not pfp 2 in my book

                    Comment

                    • LA BAD BOY
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Apr 2009
                      • 1069
                      • 51
                      • 124
                      • 2,010

                      #70
                      FRAUD BUMWEATHER is fightin PACQUIAO s left over!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP