if cotto has a problem w/ a catchweight he should throw team pac's contract in the garbage.
a fight at where both combatants have negotiated to fight at a maximal limit of 145 lbs is both a catchweight as well as a WW fight.
the WW division is anything between 147-142 lbes.
lol... team pac ain't rewriting the rules. WW is anything between 147-141 lbs.
a fight at contracted at a limit of 145 lbs is still a WW fight.
yes, it depends on negotiations.
yes, it depends on negotiations.
it's not spinning, its facts. WW is anything from 147-141 lbs.
it doesn't matter, WW is anything from 147-141 lbs.
the fact that cotto can ACTUALLY put his belts on the line for a catchweight of 145 lbs should tell you that you are barking up the wrong tree.
if the rules were interpreted according to your interpretation, then cotto would not be able to put his belts on the line for a 145 lbs fight. nuff said.
a fight at where both combatants have negotiated to fight at a maximal limit of 145 lbs is both a catchweight as well as a WW fight.
the WW division is anything between 147-142 lbes.
lol... team pac ain't rewriting the rules. WW is anything between 147-141 lbs.
a fight at contracted at a limit of 145 lbs is still a WW fight.
If Klitschko fights Arreola and limits Arreola to 225 pounds, is that ok?
If Bute fights Andrade and makes Andrade weigh 165 pounds, is that ok?
You can spin it however you want, but its still bull****. The title should NOT be on the line.
it doesn't matter, WW is anything from 147-141 lbs.
the fact that cotto can ACTUALLY put his belts on the line for a catchweight of 145 lbs should tell you that you are barking up the wrong tree.
if the rules were interpreted according to your interpretation, then cotto would not be able to put his belts on the line for a 145 lbs fight. nuff said.
Comment