Tommy Hearns vs Paul Williams at 147
Collapse
-
u are a tool. first of abraham beats the living hell out of williams, but thats another conversation. williams doesnt stand a chance in hell against hearns. i mean are u serious? the guy holds wins over margarito and a past prime innactive winky wright. u compare him to tommy hearns? TOMMY HEARNS!?And i have no doubts in my mind that Williams beats both Pav and AA.
Hearns doesnt have the legs to give paul angles to cut his workrate in half....Tommy would try to FIGHT him rather then outbox him....and that plays intop Williams favor....Williams throws more...hes bigger....taller..has the longer reach...has the better chin.
I just cant pick Hearns in ths fight.
tommy outboxed leonard, benitez and hill, i think he can outbox williams. as for those saying he never fought anyone as big as williams. FALSE, he fought and beat (outboxed) virgil hill, a solid 175lber who had a long career as a CW.
hearns was easy to hit? okey u just went from igorant to straight ******ed. hearns was one of the most skilled fighters in the history of boxing. very hard to hit. hagler hit him cuz hearns chose to fight rather than box. barkley caught him cuz hearns was so dominant he got sloppy. everyone gets hit, but hearns wasnt by any means easy to hit. those guys are WAY bigger punchers than williams who wouldnt do the same damage even if he got the chance. if williams fought at 160 against quality oposition he would get KOd himself anyways. king arthur would put him on a stretcher.
youre so ****** i dont even know what to say. hearns toys with williams. this is a complete mismatch. hearns can outbox him all night if he chooses, or he can fight him and beat the **** out of him, or he can set up a big right and knock him clean out.
hearns-williams would most likely end up like hearns-shuler.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment