Roach Budges, Says "145" is Good For Pacquiao-Cotto
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
both fighters were under the limit and yes i do believe that the fight should of not have been for sweet peas tittleComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Compare the opposition...Ass-Hat.
Am I impressed by a SD win over the #3 WW in the world...A man with a stone beard and almost impenetrable D...A guy that has 1 legitimate loss and has never been dominated...O lets not forget with one eye for 9 rounds...? Your damn right I am.
Put Pac in with Clottey see if he has a Hatton-esk type of night...Clottey aint getting beat by anybody at WW by brutal K.O or being put in a boxing clinic....sorry.
Put Hatton in there with Clottey....Nevermind...I like Hatton to much to wish him that.Last edited by BOOMbip; 06-23-2009, 08:14 PM.Comment
-
At first, I was kind of mad at Pacquiao and Roach for asking Cotto to drain down to 143. But after analyzing their motives, I think I've figured this **** out. It looks to me like he is either letting Cotto have the fight at 145 with a lesser cut of the money, or have it at 143 while letting Cotto have a little bit bigger slice of the purse cut. I don't think he is worried about beating Cotto at a certain weight. I think he is using it to try to squeeze more money out of the fight, and I can't be mad at Pacquiao for that. He deserves the lion's share in this fight. I know Clottey, Mosley and Margarito are better opponents than D. Diaz, ODLH, and Hatton. But it's still the idea that Pacquiao has won his fights by putting a stamp on them since he fought JMM.Comment
Comment