Originally posted by shadeyfizzle
View Post
Pacs desicion to vacate was his and his teams desicion, period, you hoenstly telling me that a corrupt *** like jose sulaiman wouldnt allow him to take on each WBC titleholder from 135-147 all while he held the belts at the same time? Hell yes he would. The only thing stopping pac from doing that is...
Currently at 140 that title is vacant, a fight could easily be arranged to allow a cash cow like pac to fight for that title and take it. Valero is the champ at 135, berto is the champ at 147.
In order to bring legtimacy to the comparison of armstrong hed have to beat all three and hold them at the same time. AND YES, they would let him do it. Doing it would seriously bring a legit comparison, until then, pac is just moving up and collecting paychecks against big names like everyone else. There is a reason why armstrong is rated 2 or 3rd all time usually. And its not because he wouldnt step into the ring against slick boxers, its not because he was matched against guys who possibly could play into what would make him successfull, its not because he moved up to up his PPV status, NO he did it because he dared to be great, something only a guy like hopkins i can honestly say really tries anymore. Not mayweather and not pac i can truely say really do this, i know thats a strong opinion, but neither of those guys really give a *** about history, they care about the money, th eonly difference is that one of them has a fanbase and is a genuine nice guy, so its acceptable. No matter how you look at it, there is no comparison from pac to armstrong other than a couple of similarities.
Comment