Nate Campbell Talks Bradley, Pacquiao, Floyd, More

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GJaime99
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Apr 2009
    • 207
    • 6
    • 0
    • 6,494

    #71
    I don't think Nate can hang with Pac... I watched his last fight with funeka where he barely got a majority decision, and he looked less than impressive...

    Having never fought at 140, I wonder if he can even hang with the prospects like Khan, Ortiz, Bradley etc...

    Comment

    • DonTaseMeBrah
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2009
      • 5828
      • 683
      • 575
      • 6,409

      #72
      Originally posted by trainhard_187
      Campbell hit the nail right on the head when he said he exposed Diaz and took him too school and then Marquezs gets his hand on Diaz and considered even higher then Nate.

      Why isnt Nate high on the list since he beat Diaz before Marquez did.

      being in the p4p is also about your overall body of work. marquez is greater than nate. campbell beating baby bull who isnt in the top 10 & marquez arguably beating pacquiao 2x who is the current p4p 1 & beating MAB a former p4p is the reason why marquez is higher than nate. If john ruiz beat roy jones jr. he's not overtaking roy jones jr spot.

      Originally posted by OnePunch
      hi. welcome to 8 years later. Glad you could join us.........


      O i get it now,

      first Pacquaio doesnt fight "black" fighters. When i show u evidence where he fought 3 straight black figthers in 3 straight fights its 8 years ago now.

      Isnt Pacquiao trying to fight the slickest boxer of this era?


      Terry brah,

      why dont u just stop beating around the bush & say why doenst Manny Pacquiao fight the guy your managing Nate Campbell.
      Last edited by DonTaseMeBrah; 05-26-2009, 06:39 PM.

      Comment

      • SkillspayBills
        Garlic Butter Gang!
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Aug 2007
        • 29181
        • 2,155
        • 3,739
        • 61,188

        #73
        Nate vs Bradley makes my freaking mouth water. Nate should do some damage at 140.

        Comment

        • theAleph
          Contender
          • Jun 2007
          • 154
          • 6
          • 1
          • 6,228

          #74
          Originally posted by OnePunch
          hi. welcome to 8 years later. Glad you could join us.........
          LOL. Seriously, Nate is not on the short list that Manny would be fighting in the near term. Time to move on. Maybe you could go back to Schaeffer about that offer to fight Marquez. At this point, it is more doable than a fight with Pacquiao. Any decent manager would anyway.

          Comment

          • millcitymauler
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2008
            • 3248
            • 529
            • 542
            • 38,958

            #75
            Originally posted by SkillspayBills
            Nate vs Bradley makes my freaking mouth water. Nate should do some damage at 140.
            If that's making your mouth water, a Campbell vs Holt match-up makes mine flow like a faucet! That'd be a rock-hard match between two of the sports saltiest bad-asses. (...but I agree,Bradley would also be off the hook.)

            Comment

            • bankysotelo
              Amateur
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • Apr 2009
              • 5
              • 0
              • 0
              • 6,031

              #76
              pacquiao not avoiding black fighters

              nate i think you just want a good payday that why you're trying to lure pacman to fight you....it is obvious that all you want is money....about manny avoiding black fighters, that's a lie, manny is actually itching for a fight with a great black fighter in floyd mayweather...... he is considered one of the best in the business..

              Comment

              • handler000
                Undisputed Champion
                • Mar 2009
                • 1244
                • 30
                • 10
                • 7,332

                #77
                Originally posted by GetSumBrah
                everybody is quick to point out lehnolo ledwaba in defense of Pacquiao fighting "black" fighters.

                AGAPITO SANCHEZ!!!!!

                JORGE ELIECER JULIO!!!!!!



                PACQUIAO FOUGHT 3 STRAIGHT BLACK FIGHTERS IN 3 STRAIGHT FIGHTS STARTING WITH LEDWABA!!!!!
                Wasnt Jackson's comment based on PAC fighting African American fighters?? So once again you FAIL!!

                Comment

                • darn
                  Up and Comer
                  Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                  • Nov 2006
                  • 94
                  • 4
                  • 0
                  • 5,997

                  #78
                  nate campbell is a very cheap ugly old fighter, thats why nobodys interested of fighting him. right now he is at the bottom. he'll continue wishing that someday before he leave boxing he could fight someone whos on top. thats the only thing he can do as of this time

                  Comment

                  • Deja_Vous
                    Banned
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 4279
                    • 132
                    • 0
                    • 4,458

                    #79
                    Originally posted by darn
                    nate campbell is a very cheap ugly old fighter, thats why nobodys interested of fighting him. right now he is at the bottom. he'll continue wishing that someday before he leave boxing he could fight someone whos on top. thats the only thing he can do as of this time
                    He's better than David Diaz...

                    If he was at the bottom like you claimed I'm sure Catchweight Manny would have fought him by now.

                    Comment

                    • Ido
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jan 2009
                      • 1454
                      • 24
                      • 7
                      • 7,670

                      #80
                      Originally posted by trainhard_187
                      Campbell hit the nail right on the head when he said he exposed Diaz and took him too school and then Marquezs gets his hand on Diaz and considered even higher then Nate.

                      Why isnt Nate high on the list since he beat Diaz before Marquez did.
                      Because he would needs more then 1 name, for Ring M. to consider his placement. But apparently he cant catch a break.

                      But if he can cleans out the Jr. WW division. That means he is gunning for Marquez, Manny, and Hatton right (?).
                      Last edited by Ido; 05-26-2009, 11:10 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP