Nate Campbell Talks Bradley, Pacquiao, Floyd, More

[OnePunch]

One more thing Nate, "YOU RUINED JUAN"? cmon man, without that cut ,which should have stopped ANY fight,AND you USING your head ALL FIGHT I don't see you winning.

people see what they want to see........

[OnePunch]

I give you a good example in boxing. Mayweather when he started with his own bad boy image and trash talk he made more money.

or another example in real life. The person who shows his quality in his workplace usally earns position more then a person who is quiet and just do his job.

For us boxing is just a sport for Nate it is his job and what feeds him. At the end of the day fans wont remeber a fight all the time just little glimpse of his former glory from time to time but nothing really special. There are many former champ that work as low end job or been paralyse ( G-Man) and people dont remember them pretty well.

Well, another difference is that boxing is pretty much the only professional sport where the top athletes handpick their own opponents. In team sports like football, hockey, basketball, baseball, etc., you have playoffs to ultimately crown a champion, but even in individual sports like golf, tennis, etc., there are "tournament" formats to provide a sense of fairness. Tiger doesnt get to just play against Mickelson every time out, same as Nedal and Federer dont play each other every time, even though that would represent the biggest money. I know its not exactly the same thing, but you get my point.

[eazy_mas]

Well, another difference is that boxing is pretty much the only professional sport where the top athletes handpick their own opponents. In team sports like football, hockey, basketball, baseball, etc., you have playoffs to ultimately crown a champion, but even in individual sports like golf, tennis, etc., there are "tournament" formats to provide a sense of fairness. Tiger doesnt get to just play against Mickelson every time out, same as Nedal and Federer dont play each other every time, even though that would represent the biggest money. I know its not exactly the same thing, but you get my point.

part of it. But how many times did Nedal faced Federe or LA Laker face Boston Celtics?

There is too much pressure in boxing where one lose means a long road back to glory but other sport alway have next season or next time.

Some fighter just have one lose in beging of there career and it just hard to get fight compared to undeafted fight who keep there 0

[OnePunch]

part of it. But how many times did Nedal faced Federe or LA Laker face Boston Celtics?

There is too much pressure in boxing where one lose means a long road back to glory but other sport alway have next season or next time.

Some fighter just have one lose in beging of there career and it just hard to get fight compared to undeafted fight who keep there 0

And that falls squarely on the fans. If the fans weren't so quick to write a fighter off because of a loss, then the best would fight the tougher fights more often, because the risk of losing wouldn't be so great.

[str8jay31]

Why isnt Nate high on the list since he beat Diaz before Marquez did.

The same reason y Pacquaio is considered better than Mayweather in the public eye... On paper Pacquaio and Marquez did a better job than Nate and Mayweather did on the same fighter... Nate beat Diaz by split decision while Marquez KO'd Diaz in 9rds even tho Nate physically broke down Diaz the whole fight n Marquez was gettin his ass beat for 7 of those 9 rounds

[eazy_mas]

And that falls squarely on the fans. If the fans weren't so quick to write a fighter off because of a loss, then the best would fight the tougher fights more often, because the risk of losing wouldn't be so great.

sometimes it just not you lucky night it happen in other sports.

Like sometimes you see fighters not fight like they fight usally and end up losing and that lose could end up his boxing career.

but in other sport you have another chance. some teams in some seasons are in consistant but still they are not out of the picture completly

[baracuda]

how the hell are mexican fighters the best at lower weight classes when in every big fight between blacks and mexicans the mexicans gets his ass whoopped just like marquez will. its just alot of small mxicans and alot of them box you racist dumb ass.

complete bs!there are more great mexican fighters in lower weight classes than blacks...jmm,mab or em are few levels above nate...fact!

[Datu Puti]

Im not sure Pac does beat Nate.

I agree,,Pac does not beat Nate,...he will kill that mother****A...SLICK boxer my ass..slick boxing is just wanna look good before winning..SLICK BOXERS don't entice people to watch fights, they want a war. That is the reasons why slick boxers like NATE CAMPBELL doesn't generate PPV. Slick boxer is a boxer that wants to look good then win, rather than win then look good..**** CAMPBELL, **** GUZMAN, AND **** ALL SLICK BOXERS..PACQUIAO RULES and deal with it . The only thing Nate can do to PACQUIAO is iritate him with his mouth just like every other slick boxers...this is what PACQUIAO will do to CAMPBELL

[wizard king]

f**k nate and any boxer that pulls the race card i hope this fight will happen so mp can knock his head off.

[Datu Puti]

The same reason y Pacquaio is considered better than Mayweather in the public eye... On paper Pacquaio and Marquez did a better job than Nate and Mayweather did on the same fighter... Nate beat Diaz by split decision while Marquez KO'd Diaz in 9rds even tho Nate physically broke down Diaz the whole fight n Marquez was gettin his ass beat for 7 of those 9 rounds

Well said..just like how PACQUIAO DESTROYED BOTH De la Hoya and Hatton, while Mayweather beat them both at a less impressive fashion...People, boxing fans, historians, and experst remember HOW YOU BEAT THE OPPONENT, not by beating them dancing around and outpointing them.