Nate Campbell Talks Bradley, Pacquiao, Floyd, More

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pullcounter
    no guts no glory
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2004
    • 42582
    • 549
    • 191
    • 49,739

    #81
    I am a big fan of nate campbell, but LETS BE SERIOUS....

    Campbell needs to pick battles that he can win. It doesn't make sense for campbell to gun for pac because he's not in pac's pay bracket. He even knows this so I dunno why he's attacking pac at all.

    Campbell needs to go after guys like bradley, holt, torres, khan, ortiz, etc...

    Imho campbell should really try and get khan in the ring after khan beats ketolnek. Beating khan would give him way more exposure than any of the other titeholders.

    If hbo is cool with it, campbell should ruin all their young and upcoming boxers like vic ortiz etc...

    Also when marquez loses 2 pbf, campbell should try and get that.

    Also, campbell should try n get a hatton fight if hatton decides to return, and if possible campbell should try and get to be the return opponent.

    As for now, campbell won't get any of the big name fighters, but I'm still behind nate that he can make his mark at 140 lbs

    Comment

    • Manila Mafia
      Banned
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • May 2009
      • 162
      • 66
      • 38
      • 431

      #82
      nate is Old...

      Comment

      • v.cassiusali@ya
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 3659
        • 55
        • 0
        • 13,298

        #83
        nate is right. he can't get pacman no matter what he has. nobody will dare to watch pacman fighting a has-been.

        Comment

        • Queen_Leia
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Sep 2004
          • 4256
          • 312
          • 487
          • 30,245

          #84
          This is a joke!!!!

          Let me tell the facts of life Soupy....those boys up north at 140 will fight back and hurt you for real and for a long time. They are all under 30, Soupy and are the future of our great business.

          You are not the future...... ****.....you aren't even the present and damn sure ain't the past. So now here it is, you are going to be sending out press releases and blog forever and forever because that the one thing in boxing that you do better than anything else.

          Soupy has 5 losses and is now going up to play with the big boys...Ortiz and them will hurt that boy.

          Can you believe that Soupy is doing challenging Pacquiao? and saying that Mayweather ducked him 6 years ago? Why the phuck would they fight you Soupy, you bring nothing to the table except bankruptcy!!!!

          Comment

          • membrane
            Up and Comer
            Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
            • Oct 2008
            • 30
            • 2
            • 0
            • 6,053

            #85
            To Soupy Campbell,

            Marquez is a slick boxer? Holy crap Campbell are you a boxer or what? Marquez is an excellent counterpuncher and he fights the same way that Mexicans fight. But slick? I guess not. Should he and Pacquiao fight tonight, I bet my ass Marquez is gonna get down for good. About Jack's claim that Pac ducks blacks, now that Manny had just made clear that he wants your idol Mayweather on Oct 17, that should put a duct tape on your mouth and your trainer's. Why should a fighter like you always have to say this guy or that guy is afraid of him just to get a shot? That's lame. You're not that desperate, are you? I suggest you read one of this site's previous articles that explains why Pacquiao's accomplishments has entitled him to be called an all-time great. Take down notes if you wish so you don't forget the syntax. I can sense your bitterness and I symphatize with you, just don't say that Manny Pacquiao's team is keeping him away from slick boxers. However when you mentioned 'marketability' as a reason not getting big fights, you hit the bullseye, man. Period.

            Comment

            • jucare2
              Up and Comer
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • Jun 2008
              • 88
              • 2
              • 0
              • 6,120

              #86
              who's nate campbell?

              Nate Campbel..ah! he is the one who upset juan diaz,but has he won it as j m m did?I am not a fan of j m m but if nate will face him then campbell will be forced to retire earlier than expected..j m m will schooled him from the start up to the end of the fight..what? pacman is afraid of african/american boxer?..what!!ridiculous comment..that means campbell,bradley etc.are better fighters than hatton,diaz and morales?.come on you are kidding..i hope campbell can fight again soon and try to rebuild himself before dreaming of a mega fight with pacman...lets ugly floyd be the first in line..if and only if he can beat marquez convincingly....lets do it..

              Comment

              • mellow_mood
                BORICUA 110%
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jun 2008
                • 14133
                • 297
                • 614
                • 20,603

                #87
                Originally posted by Boy Life
                nate is Old...

                ............


                nate... should fight devon alexander

                Comment

                • Allucard
                  Undisputed Champion
                  • Jun 2007
                  • 5979
                  • 393
                  • 56
                  • 12,399

                  #88
                  Originally posted by mangler
                  I think Nate can do some damage at 140. Pac would beat him, but he could probably take the oher guys there. I wouldn't mind seein him face Bradley sumtime.
                  Nate is ollddddd man. He is done at the very top level. Sure he can still beat maybe a Diaz (barely) but a Pacquiao is a whole different fish. You need to fight at least as fast as Pacquiao to win or have something really special like brutal power, godly defense. At this point Nate isn't going to beat Pacquiao. Start learning something else Nate and save the money, stop having kids or make a football team.

                  Comment

                  • Deja_Vous
                    Banned
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 4279
                    • 132
                    • 0
                    • 4,458

                    #89
                    Originally posted by dibzvincent143
                    campbell aint beatin pac
                    How do you know?

                    Comment

                    • Deja_Vous
                      Banned
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 4279
                      • 132
                      • 0
                      • 4,458

                      #90
                      Originally posted by v.cassiusali@ya
                      nate is right. he can't get pacman no matter what he has. nobody will dare to watch pacman fighting a has-been.
                      They dared to watch Fanny fighting Oscar's has-been ass.

                      People watched him fight a NEVER HAS BEEN in David Diaz.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP