QUOTE=Soir;5376633]Im bored of these "What-Ifs and maybes. Here are the Facts
Fact 1: Lewis defeated every opponent he ever faced professionally.
Fact 2: One of those opponents was Tyson in an actual head to head match up. Lewis(36 years old) Tyson(35 years old)
You can bring up the age all you want but everybody ages different based on genetics and the way they live their life.
Tyson was well trained up to Spinks. After that...he trained on his own.
Then, you factor in 3 years in prison rotting away and when he comes out, he doesn't get himself back on track with a trainer that is right for him. He even said he was only fighting to pay back Uncle Sam. He even joked that he was fighting for weed money. His main vice was said to be the bottle.
He didn't want to be a fighter anymore and he knew he was ****...which is also why he paid off Lennox at this time. Tyson was buying time before he cashed out vs. Lewis. He had too. A loss to Lewis would have ended his milking of boxing...something he had to do in order to get the I.R.S. off his back and setup his kids.
But he put it nicely in his retirement speech: My career has been over since 1990.
Fact 3: Tyson did not avenge a single loss in his entire 50-6 Pro career
The main argument Im getting is that Tysons prime conveniently finished at 22 years old. Who the hell begins to decline after age 22? Especially a guy like Mike who had never been in any serious wars prior to the Douglas fight?
ROONEY. Who was Rooney? A former fighter that trained under Cus D'Amato who built up fighters both Mentally and Physically to reach their absolute peak and make them over-achieve.
Rooney not only trained Mike in a perfect style that suited his size, but he kept Mike trained both Mentally and Physically and under Cayton's management, Tyson was a very active fighter.
Rooney supplied the training and the game-plan and the coaching through each and every fight he was with him during the fight.
He was also motivated during that time; although there was cracks in the wall leading up to the Spinks fight. McCall talked about this as well. Tyson had to get refocused. Tyson also gives clues of his state of mind in the post-press conference after the Spinks fight.
And, if you want to bring up Bruno, that post-press conference is also very telling.
Tyson was said to actually be the only person Cus had that was a true phenom and didn't have to protect.
Easy question to answer if you are knowledgeable:
Does any version of Tyson post Rooney...after Spinks...beat any version of Tyson from when he won the title against Berbick on through his win against Spinks?
Rooney-Tyson vs. Post-Rooney-Tyson
If Tyson was prime enough to beat wbc champ Frank Bruno in 3 rounds in 1995, then he is prime enough take Evander Holyfield in 1996. No excuses for Tysons losses.
Tyson wasn't in his prime. He wasn't shot, but he wasn't in his prime. Prime is when you are fighting at a high level and either at your best or very close to it if you want to give it a loose interpretation of "prime."
Comment