Tyson vs Lewis Primes

[The Gully Gad]

The poll dont lie

lol

Even though its close....

[TEDetc]

I agree that Lennox wins , I think Lennox size and jab beats Mike easy , but if Mike could land he has got to be in with a KO shot , you take Lewis size out of it and Mike might land but as it stands Mike is a small heavy and would have a lot of trouble getting to him while being speared all night long .

The Jab would not be effective on Prime Mike. Size wouldn't be a problem either.

[The Gully Gad]

Tyson is at the UFC tonite..Just saw him now looking good...

[NakiFan]

Tyson wins, just cos its tyson lmfao

[Dave Rado]

Prime Tyson had some of the greatest defensive abilities ever just watch this video imo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qW0__AyNX4

Tyson wins by K.O

That video is ridiculously biased towards modern fighters - the only old timers in there are Pep and (if you can really count him as an old timer, because he only turned pro in 1958) Locche. How can Hamed and Tyson possibly be better defensively than people like Ray Robinson, Jack Johnson, or even Ali (whose defence was poor technically but who rarely took a clean punch in his prime)? Even in the modern era there are plenty of fighters who weren't included with better defences than Hamed or Tyson, such as Hopkins and Roy Jones.

Fun video to watch but terribly biased choice of fighters, IMO.

[STILL_DETOX]

That video is ridiculously biased towards modern fighters - the only old timers in there are Pep and (if you can really count him as an old timer, because he only turned pro in 1958) Locche. How can Hamed and Tyson possibly be better defensively than people like Ray Robinson, Jack Johnson, or even Ali (whose defence was poor technically but who rarely took a clean punch in his prime)? Even in the modern era there are plenty of fighters with better defences than Hamed or Tyson who weren't included, such as Hopkins and Roy Jones.

Fun video to watch but terribly biased choice of fighters, IMO.

lol older fighters had no defense they werent even boxing, they were fighting. look at that idiot jack dempsey

[Dave Rado]

lol older fighters had no defense they werent even boxing, they were fighting. look at that idiot jack dempsey

That's a crazy thing to say. "That idiot Dempsey" as you call him is in the top 10 of most Heavyweght ATG lists, and most rank him a lot higher than Tyson overall.

Jack Johnson is rated by many experts as the greatest defensive boxer of all time. He's gets in the top 10 of most ATG P4P lists.

[RodBarker]

That's a crazy thing to say. "That idiot Dempsey" as you call him is in the top 10 of most Heavyweght ATG lists, and most rank him a lot higher than Tyson overall.

Jack Johnson is rated by many experts as the greatest defensive boxer of all time. He's gets in the top 10 of most ATG P4P lists.

But they are wrongly rated , the modern day top class fighters would take Dempsey and Johnson to school in my opinion .

[Dave Rado]

But they are wrongly rated , the modern day top class fighters would take Dempsey and Johnson to school in my opinion .

I love how your opinion is "right" and everyone else's, including those of the vast majority of boxing experts, is "wrong". You're entitled to disagree with them, but to say "they are wrongly rated" isn't just disagreeing, it's saying you're right and they're all wrong.

[Joeyzagz]

Lennox was scary good. He's big, tall, quick and powerful, and on top of that he's smarter than you inside the ring.

Vitali was one of the few opponents who took away the physical advantages, but he still ended up failing. Lennox prevailed by nailing that big idiot in his eye, while Vitali was hopelssly going for the knockout.

Lennox is a winner, Tyson is not.