Ok, before i start i'd just like to say i'm a big fan of both these guys and i'm trying to be objective, trying to create debate and adult conversation 
Most people agree that Calzaghe is the best SMW ever, there are a few that dont but for the sake of this argument we'll go with the majority. The question is....is there anyway Froch COULD surpass him in most peoples eyes? Hear me out...
Both Froch and Calzaghe's resume is fairly weak so far (at least until Calzaghe became more main stream), Calzaghe definitely has the edge with Eubank, Lacy, Kessler, Hopkins, Jones Jr as well as a few names like Reid, Sheika, Michall, Woodhall but could Froch get the big fights in in the time he has left to surpass him in terms of lagacy?
Froch is willing to fight anyone, anywhere! And assuming he can win every fight he has left before he retires (which is a big big ask i grant u) who would he need to fight to be considered 'greater' than Calzaghe? Or is Calzaghe's lagacy untouchable at this point due to his 11yrs as world champion? Froch beat a solid Pascal, a good Taylor...what if he went the route most people said Calzaghe should and fought and beat Pavlik? then Abraham? Who else? Hopkins? Kessler? I m not saying he will beat these guys but for this argument to work we have to assume he will??
Discuss...

Most people agree that Calzaghe is the best SMW ever, there are a few that dont but for the sake of this argument we'll go with the majority. The question is....is there anyway Froch COULD surpass him in most peoples eyes? Hear me out...
Both Froch and Calzaghe's resume is fairly weak so far (at least until Calzaghe became more main stream), Calzaghe definitely has the edge with Eubank, Lacy, Kessler, Hopkins, Jones Jr as well as a few names like Reid, Sheika, Michall, Woodhall but could Froch get the big fights in in the time he has left to surpass him in terms of lagacy?
Froch is willing to fight anyone, anywhere! And assuming he can win every fight he has left before he retires (which is a big big ask i grant u) who would he need to fight to be considered 'greater' than Calzaghe? Or is Calzaghe's lagacy untouchable at this point due to his 11yrs as world champion? Froch beat a solid Pascal, a good Taylor...what if he went the route most people said Calzaghe should and fought and beat Pavlik? then Abraham? Who else? Hopkins? Kessler? I m not saying he will beat these guys but for this argument to work we have to assume he will??
Discuss...

Comment