Tweet
Read how ****** this article is. Some of these guys are so ****ing ****** that its not even funny. And these guys are ment to be historical writers?
Look at this quote made by a 'boxing historian',
“Let’s just look at the two fights against Hatton,” said Mike Silver, an historian and author of The Arc of Boxing. “Mayweather calls Hatton ‘the toughest fighter I ever faced’ and Pacquiao utterly destroyed him. C’mon, if Mayweather has the skills he professes to have, he should’ve dominated a club fighter like Hatton.
This is one of ths ******est things ive read in my life. So because Pac ko'd Hatton in 2 rounds, and because it took Floyd 10, that makes Pac a greater fighter than Floyd?
WTF???????????????????????????????????????
So these so called boxing historians must have forgotten how hard it is for fighters to come back from a knockout defeat. Floyd inflicted Hatton his first loss and first KO. If Floyd beat Hatton by decision, then there could be an argument, but Floyd TKO'd him!
These writers are so negetive towards Floyd, no wonder he says he doesnt read **** thats written about him.
I mean the reason Michael Rosenthal gave for Floyd being 2nd to Manny was that Manny fought the best fighters, in reference to Oscar and Hatton.
Then i ask myself, what was a harder fight Pac vs Oscar at 147 where Oscar looked like someone close to his death bed, or Oscar-Mayweather at 154?
People shouldnt forget, Floyd already beat Oscar and ko'd Hatton before Pac did.
And this ent a hate thread on Pac, because the guys one of my favourite fighters and i root for him in all his fights. Ive been a fan ever since the Morales fight, so dont think im hating.
Look at this quote made by a 'boxing historian',
“Let’s just look at the two fights against Hatton,” said Mike Silver, an historian and author of The Arc of Boxing. “Mayweather calls Hatton ‘the toughest fighter I ever faced’ and Pacquiao utterly destroyed him. C’mon, if Mayweather has the skills he professes to have, he should’ve dominated a club fighter like Hatton.
This is one of ths ******est things ive read in my life. So because Pac ko'd Hatton in 2 rounds, and because it took Floyd 10, that makes Pac a greater fighter than Floyd?
WTF???????????????????????????????????????
So these so called boxing historians must have forgotten how hard it is for fighters to come back from a knockout defeat. Floyd inflicted Hatton his first loss and first KO. If Floyd beat Hatton by decision, then there could be an argument, but Floyd TKO'd him!
These writers are so negetive towards Floyd, no wonder he says he doesnt read **** thats written about him.
I mean the reason Michael Rosenthal gave for Floyd being 2nd to Manny was that Manny fought the best fighters, in reference to Oscar and Hatton.
Then i ask myself, what was a harder fight Pac vs Oscar at 147 where Oscar looked like someone close to his death bed, or Oscar-Mayweather at 154?
People shouldnt forget, Floyd already beat Oscar and ko'd Hatton before Pac did.
And this ent a hate thread on Pac, because the guys one of my favourite fighters and i root for him in all his fights. Ive been a fan ever since the Morales fight, so dont think im hating.
Well it's sort of true, why didn't Floyd watch the tapes and realize Hatton leaves his face open for huge punches.
It's not really a good reason though, because I think Floyd still dominated a hungrier Hatton, although in a higher weight class, Floyds not really that big himself.
however, Pacquiaos resume >>> Mayweathers. Way to many good names on Pacquiaos resume, even if he fought bums for the next 2 years he's still an atg because of the work he did in the lower weight classes. At 130+ you can give him a shot at beating anyone from 130,135 and 140 in the history of the sport. Debatable, but still an achievement to be able to be a winning option.
Comment