2 years ago, people would call you delusional if you think Pac would KO both Oscar and Hatton.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
It's funny now Pacquiao's last 3 wins were "easy fights"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by SekondzOut View Postword around the boxing world is that Manny has gotten better in each fight since his 2nd fight with JMM.......ok break it down.......Diaz is not in JMM's skill class and thats FACT!........DLH was physically unable to perform like DLH is known for.....thats FACT!!!!.......Hatton is not on JMM's level and thats FACT!!!........if you take 3 lesser opponents than the last guy to trouble you......you SHOULD look good!........if you can get past the hype you'll see that these were EASY fights disguised by excellent promotion.......I dont wanna sound like I'm hatin' on Pac because I really do like him but I call a spade a spade.........lets just see whats next or who's next on Pac's plate........Arum screamin' Cotto.......Cotto under 147 aint Cotto
you probably want pac vs jmm. pac wins
pac needs to fight jmm again. pac wins
jmm deserves another fight. pac wins
controversial or not. he doesn't need to fight him immediately. give the guy some space. relax dude they'll fight it out if jmm is great as your making him out.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The_Bringer View PostPacquiao is a great fighter, and no doubt already at top 50 ATG.
But, c'mon now.
Diaz was a nobody, you have to admit that much. He was a titleist, not a Champion. Hell, even the mummified version of "El Terrible" whipped his ass in his final fight.
Oscar was a good win, but again, c'mon now. He's no ATG fighter himself and he's famous for losing every big fight he's ever been in. Couple that with the fact that he was severely weight drained (Even Pac's coach Freddie Roach said this in 24/7) and that's why that win is discredited.
Hatton was a good win, with a stellar KO. I was happy to see Ricky laid out because I've been saying for a while now that he was benefitting from a **** division.
Comment
-
so pac wins tough fights and gets criticized. then pac wins easy fights and pac gets criticized. there's just no pleasing some people
Comment
-
Originally posted by nj_evoixgsr View Postand how many times did you bet against pac? all 3?
you probably want pac vs jmm. pac wins
pac needs to fight jmm again. pac wins
jmm deserves another fight. pac wins
controversial or not. he doesn't need to fight him immediately. give the guy some space. relax dude they'll fight it out if jmm is great as your making him out.
Bless!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pullcounter View Postso pac wins tough fights and gets criticized. then pac wins easy fights and pac gets criticized. there's just no pleasing some people.......like you said he won EASY fights....thats ALL I'm sayin'.....his last 3 fights were EASY!!!......thats it!
Comment
-
Originally posted by SekondzOut View PostI dont think anybody's criticizing Pac.......like you said he won EASY fights....thats ALL I'm sayin'.....his last 3 fights were EASY!!!......thats it!
Comment
-
Originally posted by SekondzOut View Postword around the boxing world is that Manny has gotten better in each fight since his 2nd fight with JMM.......ok break it down.......Diaz is not in JMM's skill class and thats FACT!........DLH was physically unable to perform like DLH is known for.....thats FACT!!!!.......Hatton is not on JMM's level and thats FACT!!!........if you take 3 lesser opponents than the last guy to trouble you......you SHOULD look good!........if you can get past the hype you'll see that these were EASY fights disguised by excellent promotion.......I dont wanna sound like I'm hatin' on Pac because I really do like him but I call a spade a spade.........lets just see whats next or who's next on Pac's plate........Arum screamin' Cotto.......Cotto under 147 aint Cotto
Comment
-
Originally posted by jching View PostExactly, Manny would fight these guys at their own weights and would stand a chance at beating them too. So that's why I'm a little bit pissed at Roach and Arum for making a way for these justified excuses after a Manny win. I give him props for beating Hatton at 140 in a way others couldn't, but as Roach said prior to the fight, he was tailor made for Pac.
Why can't people just accept Manny is many times a better fighter than Hatton? Always finding a way to discredit a win or justify your gunning for the other man.
How could Roach's prediction be more accurate all the time against the prediction of other coaches and boxing experts?
Admit it. Manny is just a better fighter than you imagine.
Comment
-
3 wins in 3 different weight class less than 1 year is ***king great! Some people may discredit him due to easy winnings... Yet the answer is "No Mas" Pacman is really damn good. Y? Diaz - 1st trial on lightweight "checking on strengths speed and power by pacman" DLH - Dlh wasn't punching due to a reason of him just being full defense, a open defense would end up his head on the floor. Hitman - PAc showing of his right and left in 6 mins... Damn his good. Been a PAC hater and now things are changing for me... Mayweather is the man but PAC can surely bring this guy out.... I think his going to show a MASSive body shot for KO. so bye bye Mayweather... Yet going to cotto at 147 is not a good idea.... 140 is alright Y?????? - because he wants a rematch at marquez and a fight with PBF.... going 147 will make PACMAN dodging Marquez and PBF... Fight with cotto should be at 140 or 142...
So for the record PAC cant fight everyone in one whole year go line up guys....
Comment
Comment