Originally posted by baracuda
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
It's funny now Pacquiao's last 3 wins were "easy fights"
Collapse
-
-
You can laugh at me. Because his last 3 fights haven't tested him one bit.
Say what you want but DLH was awful and even in the Mayweather fight people noted he couldn't pull the trigger anymore. He didn't have anything on his punches and he fought like a coward. At least when Morales got his ass kicked in the 3rd fight he went out like a warrior. Even though he could have gotten back up he took a solid 3 round ass whoopin. DLH went in the corner and hid. I will never forgive DLH was frauding us into watching that.
Diaz was tough, but he wasn't that good and his style was perfect for Pac. I thought of him as a "belt holder."
As for Hatton, many will say he was great and all that. Me I'm sorry I'm not impressed with his resume. And he has no defense.
Even though I **** on all of those 3 fights Pac still has a great resume. He beat Barrera and took out Morales. Then he fought JJM and won by a close decision. And he has other solid wins.
So to me Pac has always been great. But this outburst of Manny mania is solely because of the Hatton fight. He was great before then. Knocking out Hatton didn't prove anything to me because I already thought he was great.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by GrizzleBoy View PostFirst things first.
1. I think that Manny did get easy fights for his last two bouts. I don't mean walkover easy, but in terms of boxing difficulty, they really werent what I would call fights that he had to struggle with. You only have to watch them to see how much trouble it was for him. I'm not even going to talk about the DLH fight. He was ****ed.
What interests me, is that people will AGREE that Hatton looked like **** in the fight.
They will AGREE that he has no defense.
They will AGREE that he ran STRAIGHT into Mannys punches.
They will AGREE that he boxed like an Amateur.
YET, when it comes to contributing any of those facts to his win to show what a poor performance Ricky put on, it's "STFU STOP MAKING EXCUSES GAYWEATHER FAN BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH".
How is someone with practically no defense, who walks into your punches with his hands down in straight lines NOT an easy fight?
If that's not a gift to any boxer, then what is it?
2. **** Mayweather.
The dude had never lost at 140, I don't care if you say he can't box for ****, he was still considered better than anybody else at jw class.
Comment
-
Originally posted by lefhooktodabody View PostYou can laugh at me. Because his last 3 fights haven't tested him one bit.
Say what you want but DLH was awful and even in the Mayweather fight people noted he couldn't pull the trigger anymore. He didn't have anything on his punches and he fought like a coward. At least when Morales got his ass kicked in the 3rd fight he went out like a warrior. Even though he could have gotten back up he took a solid 3 round ass whoopin. DLH went in the corner and hid. I will never forgive DLH was frauding us into watching that.
Diaz was tough, but he wasn't that good and his style was perfect for Pac. I thought of him as a "belt holder."
As for Hatton, many will say he was great and all that. Me I'm sorry I'm not impressed with his resume. And he has no defense.
Even though I **** on all of those 3 fights Pac still has a great resume. He beat Barrera and took out Morales. Then he fought JJM and won by a close decision. And he has other solid wins.
So to me Pac has always been great. But this outburst of Manny mania is solely because of the Hatton fight. He was great before then. Knocking out Hatton didn't prove anything to me because I already thought he was great.
fair enough homie!
Comment
Comment