Had Floyd Turned Pro At 16 He Would Have Been A 12 Weight Champ

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • flipbjefrox
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2006
    • 5175
    • 362
    • 78
    • 62,737

    #21
    why is floyd's career based on woulda shoulda coulda instead of his actual accomplishment.
    he woulda beat margarito
    he woulda beat kostya
    he woulda beat cotto
    he woulda been 12 divisional champ if he started at 16
    he woulda beat hatton at 140

    Comment

    • Pullcounter
      no guts no glory
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jan 2004
      • 42582
      • 549
      • 191
      • 49,739

      #22
      Originally posted by Bhopreign
      From 106 to 154, sadly he would still be criticized.
      c'mon guys, let pac have his props so that when floyd beats him, it makes it more juicy.

      Comment

      • El Jesus
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Sep 2004
        • 9468
        • 553
        • 191
        • 17,604

        #23
        Originally posted by mangler
        Why this thread TS? Cats are praisin Pac right now, not ****tin on Mr boat buyer.
        lol, this post made me lol. but i think its probably because people point out that pac turned pro at 16 and moved up x amount of weight classes. But if you factor his accomplishments at the lower weights like they matter, then those KO losses matter also.for me personally, i dont factor pacs accomplishments until he grew into manhood as a damn adult. it isnt fair to rip pac for those ko losses as a kid, however, i wont sit there and praise his time at those weights neither because again, he was just a kid coming into his own.

        Comment

        • loui_ludwig
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Oct 2005
          • 7669
          • 184
          • 2
          • 19,376

          #24
          Waaa, who cares.

          Comment

          • shadeyfizzle
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Feb 2008
            • 7448
            • 160
            • 43
            • 13,959

            #25
            Originally posted by MELLY-MEL...
            haha, very true.
            Im not a floyd hater or a pac hugger but it gets on my nerves when the floyd boys **** on the fact that floyd is undefeated and pac has losses. And when people remind them that pac turned pro at 16 at 106lbs...the response is always the same..."floyd fought at 106lbs at 16 also" "if floyd turned pro at 16 he would have all the same accomplishments as pacquiao but more and better"


            Sorry guys it doesnt work that way. If you're going to compare...it goes both ways.

            If pacquiao had had the skills he has now since age 16 instead of just raw talent....he'd arguably be the greatest fighter of all time.

            Comment

            • Bhopreign
              Banned
              • Jun 2006
              • 11273
              • 419
              • 100
              • 12,036

              #26
              Originally posted by Pullcounter
              c'mon guys, let pac have his props so that when floyd beats him, it makes it more juicy.
              Who said anything about Pac, farthest thing from my mind.

              Comment

              • flipbjefrox
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • May 2006
                • 5175
                • 362
                • 78
                • 62,737

                #27
                Originally posted by El Jesus
                lol, this post made me lol. but i think its probably because people point out that pac turned pro at 16 and moved up x amount of weight classes. But if you factor his accomplishments at the lower weights like they matter, then those KO losses matter also.for me personally, i dont factor pacs accomplishments until he grew into manhood as a damn adult. it isnt fair to rip pac for those ko losses as a kid, however, i wont sit there and praise his time at those weights neither because again, he was just a kid coming into his own.
                he was a kid fighting for championships instead of wearing head gear.

                Comment

                • Spacey1991
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 8885
                  • 247
                  • 282
                  • 18,684

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Bhopreign
                  From 106 to 154, sadly he would still be criticized.
                  Come on stop being ******, Pacquiao has just had a great win and your trying to take **** away from him... just give it a rest.

                  Comment

                  • Bhopreign
                    Banned
                    • Jun 2006
                    • 11273
                    • 419
                    • 100
                    • 12,036

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Spacey1991
                    Come on stop being ******, Pacquiao has just had a great win and your trying to take **** away from him... just give it a rest.
                    That opening post said nothing about Pacquaio, not even thinking about him.

                    Comment

                    • fdotorres
                      Banned
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 5564
                      • 172
                      • 910
                      • 6,035

                      #30
                      he would have a couple of losses too, you forgot that part

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP