Manny Pacquiao Avoids Black Fighters, Says Jackson

[paylapz83]

[

What El Jesus said is simply fact, not opinions, and if you disagreed with him and had any intelligence, then you'd explain why you disagree and provide hard evidence to back up your claims, instead of resorting to name calling.

fact of what?breeding dogs?i know its only an analysis but how come breeds
mentioned into mixed of races?huh?

[Dave Rado]

fact of what?breeding dogs?i know its only an analysis but how come breeds
mentioned into mixed of races?huh?

That wasn't in El Jesus's post, you're confusing him with Ch@mpBox@PR.

I said that El Jesus's post was factual.

[antweezy23]

JDJ statements are beyond ridiculous!**** Jackson

HALF AFRICAN AMERICAN HALF FILIPINO...FULLY PROUD!

[OnePunch]

The whole race arguement is kind of silly, but I can say one thing. Anyone that claims that Pac was the best at 135 because he beat David Diaz (the weakest title holder) then they must also say that Roy Jones was the best heavyweight for beating Ruiz (the weakest title holder).

[paylapz83]

That wasn't in El Jesus's post, you're confusing him with Ch@mpBox@PR.

I said that El Jesus's post was factual.

ok enough for this your just over acted yet.....peace.....

[Left Hook Tua]

Yes, I can agree. David Diaz deserved it more then Nate

nate campbell - 32-5 wins over juan diaz and kid diamond

david diaz - 34-1 wins over santa cruz and erik morales

you guys act like nate's resume is so superior. if santa cruz had gotten the nod over casa , david would be lineal champ at 135. lol

by the way , the diaz fight was planned before pacquiao fought marquez in march of 2008.

campbell barely won against juan that same month. the diaz fight with pacquiao was june.

nate didn't get to the top of the rankings 'til barely 3 months before pacquiao fought david and certainly after arum had already decided to have pacquiao fight diaz for the wbc 135 belt.

end of 2007 ring rankings at 135

Joel Casamayor, Champion

#1 Juan Diaz
#2 David Diaz
#3 Jose Armando Santa Cruz
#4Julio Diaz
#5 Nate Campbell
#6 Michael Katsidis
#7 Yuri Romanov
#8 Amir Khan
#9 Zahir Raheem
#10 Anthony Peterson

[Dave Rado]

Anyone that claims that Pac was the best at 135 because he beat David Diaz.

I don't think anyone has said that, though?

[El Dominicano]

nate campbell - 32-5 wins over juan diaz and kid diamond

david diaz - 34-1 wins over santa cruz and erik morales

you guys act like nate's resume is so superior. if santa cruz had gotten the nod over casa , david would be lineal champ at 135. lol

by the way , the diaz fight was planned before pacquiao fought marquez in march of 2008.

campbell barely won against juan that same month. the diaz fight with pacquiao was june.

nate didn't get to the top of the rankings 'til barely 3 months before pacquiao fought david and certainly after arum had already decided to have pacquiao fight diaz for the wbc 135 belt.

end of 2007 ring rankings at 135

Joel Casamayor, Champion

#1 Juan Diaz
#2 David Diaz
#3 Jose Armando Santa Cruz
#4Julio Diaz
#5 Nate Campbell
#6 Michael Katsidis
#7 Yuri Romanov
#8 Amir Khan
#9 Zahir Raheem
#10 Anthony Peterson

David Diaz is still

TRASH He couldn't decisively beat a washed up EM , some even had EM winning that

[paylapz83]

That wasn't in El Jesus's post, you're confusing him with Ch@mpBox@PR.

I said that El Jesus's post was factual.

The whole race arguement is kind of silly, but I can say one thing. Anyone that claims that Pac was the best at 135 because he beat David Diaz (the weakest title holder) then they must also say that Roy Jones was the best heavyweight for beating Ruiz (the weakest title holder).

hu you think is best fighter at135??just like jackson your an idiot too...

[Maestro USA]

Indeginous pre columbian natives arent blacks. Descendants from african ****** are. Or are you such a genius, you think that latin america, which had more ****** than ANYONE else, doesnt have such a population?

I feel like every year on boxingscene, the distinction between indian, european white and black has to be clarified on here because of the fact that latin america is so racially mixed up.

Some people show clear features of a native race, white latins, black latins, indios etc. Some people are more mixed, thus its impossible to tell. But guys like gamboa, guzman and miranda its ****ing obvious what their lineage is. If you cant see that, i dont know what to tell you.

For some of the same reasons you mentioned why some countries deny their Black ancestry, Filipinos always claim they have Spanish blood, even though 97% of the population is pure Asian. They pretend to have Spanish because everyone on TV, in the Government, or in all the big business corporations are lighter skinned with some Spanish mixed it, so it makes them feel "higher class" if they claim not being pure Asian. They spend millions of peso's per year on skin whitening products to sell the lie even further. The amount of racism among their own race is astonishing!