Manny Pacquiao Avoids Black Fighters, Says Jackson
Collapse
-
LMFAO... Moronic post...
Mayweather beat him at the end of his prime which is still acceptable... boring or not. Pacman didn't even beat DLH the boxer that night... he beat DLH the promoter... He wasn't even the same anymore...
Pacman is the most overrated boxer in the world and it'll show May 2nd
is this the "black logic" their talking about in the earlier post? this guy said PBF beat at the end of his Prime ODLH by SPLIT DECISION and a year later the PACMAN BEAT the Living **** out of ODLH and made him QUIT on his stool, then this ****** guy said dela hoya wasnt even a boxer? dude he messed up his training you could not say he is truly shot, he just messed up his training and thats his fault for hiring dumb people to watch his health.
Comment
-
black figthers is not even a good one filipinos,puertoricans, mexicans and the new uk guys are the reason why boxing still a big show they come to figth toe to toe black figthers run too muchComment
-
OMG i didnt know the media is the one scoring the bouts, maybe dan rafael can judge the may 2 bout? dumbass, the judges are the ones who decide the fight because they can see what the untrained eyes cannot see. get it dumb ass?it's still funny how the pacman fans still swallow this sh-it about manny being number one,marquez beat him twice,mostly all of media and some in phillipines say that,even nonito donaire thought he lost,last night brian kenny and dan rafael said he thought marquez won both fights,,,you guys are delusionalComment
-
another dumb poster who likes to hate but cant keep their facts straight. pac has beaten 4 hall of famers, champ in 5 divisions, 3 lineal titles. joe c = fought old BHOP and JONES(shot). cant compare dude.I'm sure Jackson is just speaking out of frustration as someone who cares about the sport. Maybe Pacquiao didn't duck in the past, maybe he did, but there are two facts here that are undeniable.
1. Pacquiao would be destroyed by Floyd Mayweather or Paul Williams. He would also probably lose to Nate Campbell or Timothy Bradley.
2. Pacquiao's "achievements" from the lower weight classes are drastically overblown. Joe Calzaghe dominated 168 for ten years, the Klitschkos are dominating heavyweight, but everyone recognizes that those things are meaningless.Comment
-
fk maywather he lost against jose luis catillo go to you tube and watch the damn figth he dont take challenge what about cotto, williams, mosley, margarito, forest, pacman, berto he like old guys he's piece of ****Comment
-
is this guy jackson serious? lol. pacquiao fought several black fighters, although not african-americans, in the past like ledwaba, julio and sanchez.Comment
-
Guzman wasn't nearly as highly rated at the time as the people he actually fought, you obviously weren't following boxing at the time. And Raheem was in a higher weight division than him, and there was no reason to move up weight divisions just in order to fight him. And the "old washed up Morales", as you call him, was 29, younger than Pacquiao is now.
Maybe you should learn a bit about boxing before posting here.Comment
-
More than 80% of African Americans have some white blood and most of the rest have some Native American blood, sp what on earth are you trying to say, if anything? Guzman is as black as any African American is. People aren't breeds like dogs, almost everyone is a mixture of races up to a point. This whole racist discussion is ridiculous.Guys like Guzman and Gamboa are black but not 100%, plain and simple. They are not 100% black of course, only africans are that. I think guys like Gamboa or Guzman are a mix between african and hispanic, white or whatever. ***** is considered black but hes 50% black and 50% white. I think its strange that all guys who have just a lil bit african blood are considered black but it is that way so guys like Guzman and Gamboa are black too or what do you think??Comment

Comment