DLH didn't look like an amature. You also forget he fought Pernell, the P4P best on his 23rd(around that) fight. Only people I seem to argue with on that fight are Oscar haters or defensive style fans.
If that's the case then Floyd won the first Castillo fight due to him being popular?? Since Castillo isn't the cash cow Mayweather is.
Now you are using Oscar age as a excuse for his poor showing against Pernell. Mayweather was 23 or 24 when he fought Castill. Why would I hate Oscar but Pernell got dogged over just like JCC fight
Well I could at least say he has taken more risks than Floyd.
One thing I do give Floyd over Pac is that he has at least fought someone really good in their prime.
You're just another idiot Floyd nuthugger.
Again, Hernandez got spanked by DLH before and yet Floyd gets more credit?? GTFO with that ****!!
Who said he gets more credit then DLH for a Herndez win?? I didnt say that. It was a great win for DLH too. Look you can say DLH took more risk and all that, but you only say that because he lost or had alot of close fights. Just because Mayweather is 5 times better then anybody boxing right now, doenst mean he didnt take risks, he just that good.
Money goes round the wrong way in this sport. It's really sad that JMM best option is to be used as a tune up by a bigger man.
Businesswise it's a nice move by Mayweather... he needs a tune up, an easy fight. Why pick a mediocre 140-147 guy when you can have a great but smaller fighter and make more money?
Sad, very sad... almost as sad as the ppl bitching about it.
are u a practicing "defense lawyer"....you're good..
Umm thanks to FLOYD... DLH didn't make **** of money from B-Hop or Felix Sturm.. thats for sure. ****... Pac v DLH didn't make ****.... They needed each other for that PPV money and it showed... 24/7 started cuz of Floyd.. not Oscar.
Ok I get it... So HOF = Not legendary!!!
WHAT???? Get the hell out of here.. I ban you!!! what a moron!!
HOF fighters ARE legendary!!!
And Floyd fought the BEST because Floyd fought CHAMPIONS.
And CHAMPIONS wear BELTS...
And Floyd TOOK all 6 of those BELTS from ALL those CHAMPIONS...
What you should be asking yourself is where was YOUR fav fighter at when he was doing all of this... obviously under the radar cuz Floyd was taking the spotlight.
Funny how a Floyd article pops up on here and you PR jump all over it like ****** *****... LMFAO... his articles get like 25 pages of hits in like 2 hrs.. and 95% of the time its mostly PR haters..
Jesus Christ man, you're a fucking idiot!!
You do know that the Hopkins fight did over a million buys right?? He probably got over 20 mil off that fight.
Wrong on your HOF = Legendary ****! There is a difference in an Sugar Ray Robinson and a Mike Tyson.
I'm not PR! In fact Cotto Stans annoy me big time!! But the nuthugging prize goes to Floyd Stans.
I don't understand. You mean if it's not on HBO, it somehow doesnt count? What difference does it make where the video can be viewed?
EXACTLY!!! You're learning!!!! Who the **** cares what is on youtube unless its a highlight tape??? Put it on HBO where it counts... And Tony has been on HBO several times so whats the problem... YOu have to make a fight marketable and challenging at the same time... 2 things Tony couldn't do against Floyd... He wouldn't win a round
hes only been at that weight class for 2 years, dont act like hes been there forever. And cotto was gonna get his but when you fight somebody like gomez it kinda of jacks it up.
Now you are using Oscar age as a excuse for his poor showing against Pernell. Mayweather was 23 or 24 when he fought Castill. Why would I hate Oscar but Pernell got dogged over just like JCC fight
Mayweather wasn't a draw back then
When did I mention Oscar was so and so old when he fought Pernell?
JCC did lose the fight and I was going for Chavez. Chavez is also one of my all time favorite boxers. As you can see, I see **** in an unbiased way. I would say the same **** if I wasn't an Oscar fan.
Comment