Now is there ANY QUESTION that Oscar was dehydrated and weight-drained?!?!

[MR ITALIAN]

nope!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[We want Floyd]

What was he stepping out of the way from? Oscar wasn't throwing anything.

I'm actually seeing Oscar flinching from a lightweight. The Oscar who gladly traded with Trinidad, Sturm, Quartey, vargas, hopkins, etc..,

You thought Oscar might have thrown the fight?

LMFAO, Oscar trading w/ Tito, B-Hop, running yes, but trading, haha. The time that he did trade with Ike, his @ss landed on the canvas.

[Thwf]

It was never an issue whether dela Hoya was weight-drained or not. Fact is, he lost. Being weight-drained or not, was all his fault. Pac did his job, dela Hoya team did not, they all lost...zzz...

On the bright side, that nutrition expert could make money on that permanent weight reducing diet.

[We want Floyd]

See, you guys wheel out Ye 'Ole Victim Wagon whenever someone says anything other than "Pac's taint tastes like champagne".

Nobody hates Pac. Not even Mexicans. All people are saying is to maintain some perspective. When Mayweather beat Oscar, you guys were saying that Oscar was an old businessman. Pac beats a weight-drained Oscar 2 years later, and it's the USA beating the Russians in Lake Placid.

Yes. Pac KO'd Morales twice. A toasted Morales. The decent version of Morales has a victory over Pac. Remember? Yes. Pac has a (two?) win(s) over JMM. But don't act like he DOMINATED Marquez.

You are just getting back a bit of what YOU cultivated.

Do you also remember that PAC fought with one-eye after the 4th round. If that didn't change the course of the fight, then I don't know what did. That bad cut changed the momentum of the fight big time!

And since you brought up all three fights of PAC- Erika. In actuality, Erika looked worse at his first and third weigh in, he actually looked the best for the second one! And I was actually at the fight for the second one, and I can tell you that Erika was bigger than PAC.

[We want Floyd]

Oscar being weight-drained was just icing on the cake. PAC's success didn't revolve entirely on De La Puto coming in weight-drained.

[ßringer]

Do you also remember that PAC fought with one-eye after the 4th round. If that didn't change the course of the fight, then I don't know what did. That bad cut changed the momentum of the fight big time!

And since you brought up all three fights of PAC- Erika. In actuality, Erika looked worse at his first and third weigh in, he actually looked the best for the second one! And I was actually at the fight for the second one, and I can tell you that Erika was bigger than PAC.

This is why I can't stand most Pac fans. They take every opportunity to disrespect legends Pac has beaten like Erik, Marco, and Juan Manuel.

If it wasn't for Barrera and Morales fighting Manny, nobody would know who the hell Pacquiao even was.

Show a little damn respect.

[Thwf]

This is why I can't stand most Pac fans. They take every opportunity to disrespect legends Pac has beaten like Erik, Marco, and Juan Manuel.

If it wasn't for Barrera and Morales fighting Manny, nobody would know who the hell Pacquiao even was.

Show a little damn respect.

Ey, telling the truth isn`t bad dude. Erik, Marco, and Juan Manuel all lost fair and square to Pac, either in single, duo or trilogy. As a whole, they all lost to Pac. In fact, all three sided for dela Hoya in the last fight, it is them and you who show no respect. And it was a business matter all the way, no charity involved, wake up.

If your point makes sense, tell that to dela Hoya, whose fame he took from Julio Cesar Chavez, and doesn`t even give his son, Chavez Jr., the chance to earn big bucks.

[deliveryman]

Ey, telling the truth isn`t bad dude. Erik, Marco, and Juan Manuel all lost fair and square to Pac, either in single, duo or trilogy. As a whole, they all lost to Pac. In fact, all three sided for dela Hoya in the last fight, it is them and you who show no respect. And it was a business matter all the way, no charity involved, wake up.

If your point makes sense, tell that to dela Hoya, whose fame he took from Julio Cesar Chavez Sr., and doesn`t even give his son, Chavez Jr., the chance to earn big bucks.

Lol, most ignorant statement of all time.

Sorry dude, Oscar was well on his way becoming a superstar whether he fought Chavez Sr. or not. The only reason why Oscar fought Chavez Sr was because he wanted to gain popularity with the Mexican fans, when the two victories only made them hate Oscar more.

[ßringer]

Lol, most ignorant statement of all time.

Sorry dude, Oscar was well on his way becoming a superstar whether he fought Chavez Sr. or not. The only reason why Oscar fought Chavez Sr was because he wanted to gain popularity with the Mexican fans, when the two victories only made them hate Oscar more.

What he said.

[Thwf]

Lol, most ignorant statement of all time.

Did that statement make you the better one?

Sorry dude, Oscar was well on his way becoming a superstar whether he fought Chavez Sr. or not. The only reason why Oscar fought Chavez Sr was because he wanted to gain popularity with the Mexican fans, when the two victories only made them hate Oscar more.

Then I say the same thing: Pacquiao was well on his way to becoming a superstar whether he fought the three or not. Now if that don`t make sense to you, you just don`t want to be proven wrong. It`s your ego at work.