David Haye Slams The "Three Fight" Klitschko Deal

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • poeticlsykuac
    Interim Champion
    • Jun 2008
    • 819
    • 31
    • 2
    • 6,944

    #171
    I still think that Haye got the exact deal he wanted, why is he complaining? He get's a chance at beating their asse5. He's talking all this 5h!t, step up to the plate stop acting like a sissy. I can beat both of them at once etc. Now he is forced to fight the best two HWs in the world, he said he can win. Put your money where your mouth is, that is all I see. He talked all this 5h!t and got what he wanted, he got to fight BOTH brothers. He demanded it, he received it. How can it be seen any other way? DAVID HAYE SAID HE CAN BEAT THEM BOTH, NOW HE HAS TO PROVE IT! What is wrong with that? I think it was a hell of a move.

    Comment

    • Dave Rado
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2008
      • 8064
      • 266
      • 453
      • 14,460

      #172
      Originally posted by poeticlsykuac
      I still think that Haye got the exact deal he wanted, why is he complaining? He get's a chance at beating their asse5. He's talking all this 5h!t, step up to the plate stop acting like a sissy. I can beat both of them at once etc. Now he is forced to fight the best two HWs in the world, he said he can win. Put your money where your mouth is, that is all I see. He talked all this 5h!t and got what he wanted, he got to fight BOTH brothers. He demanded it, he received it. How can it be seen any other way? DAVID HAYE SAID HE CAN BEAT THEM BOTH, NOW HE HAS TO PROVE IT! What is wrong with that? I think it was a hell of a move.
      What's wrong with it is that it doesn't allow Haye to make any mandatory defences in between the three Klitschko fights, which means that even if he won all three fights he would be stripped of the belts, which means there won't be a unified champion at the end of it, which is bad for the health of the division, IMO. If it weren't for the fact that the three Klitschko fights have to be successive fights, I'd agree with you, but that's what the contract stipulates.

      Comment

      • Roger Mellie
        Banned
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Oct 2008
        • 5969
        • 367
        • 385
        • 6,591

        #173
        The Klitschko brothers have got form for doing this big brother ****,just ask Purrity and Sanders.

        Comment

        • Mr. Philadel
          #215Boxing
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 20893
          • 1,071
          • 1,413
          • 35,332

          #174
          Originally posted by ABOSWORTH
          Don't you think the 3 fight stipulation is a bit ridiculous? I mean come on. It's like "Oh, you can fight me, but if you beat my ass you gotta fight my big brother... and if you kick his ass too, you have to fight which ever one of us you kicked the **** out of the least..."
          I'm glad the fight is happening but this contract is crazy. I totally understand a rematch clause, that's normal but this 3 fight deal is crazy.

          On the other hand, if Haye beats Wlad, a fight with Vitali would be the fight I would want to see most, so I'm not gonna complain. I can see why Haye is like though..
          thats it in a nut shell!!

          Comment

          • Abstraction
            Observer
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Sep 2007
            • 2083
            • 163
            • 68
            • 8,501

            #175
            Originally posted by Leo Pradun
            so what is your point? Wlad would have faught Valuev but Vals promoters would never allowed that to happen and the others were not ready for Wlad at the time
            My point?

            You asked who there else there was, so i gave you a list of names.

            Come on, keep up ?

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP