Hatton Downplays Pacquiao's Win Over De La Hoya

[gopi11]

I know what you're saying, but being dehydrated will affect anyone negatively, and so Hatton is right to downplay Pac's win over DLH as its not that impressive because he was weight drained. FACT.

If DLH was not dehydrated, and Pac won in the same manner, then the win could not be downplayed. But that is not the case, and Hatton is correct in what he is saying.

Saying that Hattons win over Malignaggi should be downplayed is just ridiculous, as he was in the same good condition as he has been in all his fights. There was nothing negatively affecting Malignaggi, with the exception of weak fists, but this has always been his weakness.

Malignaggi left his heart at home....

[Titing Kabayo]

I know what you're saying, but being dehydrated will affect anyone negatively, and so Hatton is right to downplay Pac's win over DLH as its not that impressive because he was weight drained. FACT.

I totally agree with you...Hatton is right and was right also when he lost to mayweather... mayweather's win should be downplayed as well because Hatton was weak that time and referee helped Mayweather... Hatton should have won if referee was not Cortez,,, yes yes, you are correct... hatton lost because he was nothing that time.. so PBF should not get full credit buy knocking out bum Hatton... I am not saying Hatton is bum as a fighter,.,, just that time..

If DLH was not dehydrated, and Pac won in the same manner, then the win could not be downplayed. But that is not the case, and Hatton is correct in what he is saying.

You hit the nail head again.. Hatton should have KOd Oscar in just few seconds.. Hatton I think is the most powerful boxer I ever known..

Saying that Hatton's win over Malignaggi should be downplayed is just ridiculous, as he was in the same good condition as he has been in all his fights. There was nothing negatively affecting Malignaggi, with the exception of weak fists, but this has always been his weakness.

Again you are correct... Hatton should have get full credit by beating C-lever Malignaggi because they were just in the same condition...

Hatton is the best and I think you are the most unbias poster who knows the truth and everything about fatton.... keep goin..

And even if Pac beat Hatton, Pac should not get full credit because Hatton is nothing and that is an acceptable and valid excuse..

[- JCHING -]

I totally agree with you...Hatton is right and was right also when he lost to mayweather... mayweather's win should be downplayed as well because Hatton was weak that time and referee helped Mayweather... Hatton should have won if referee was not Cortez,,, yes yes, you are correct... hatton lost because he was nothing that time.. so PBF should not get full credit buy knocking out bum Hatton... I am not saying Hatton is bum as a fighter,.,, just that time..


You hit the nail head again.. Hatton should have KOd Oscar in just few seconds.. Hatton I think is the most powerful boxer I ever known..

Again you are correct... Hatton should have get full credit by beating C-lever Malignaggi because they were just in the same condition...

Hatton is the best and I think you are the most unbias poster who knows the truth and everything about fatton.... keep goin..

And even if Pac beat Hatton, Pac should not get full credit because Hatton is nothing and that is an acceptable and valid excuse..

LOL you're so funny..

Mayweather beat Hatton because he's on another level. FACT. No excuses there.

Hatton probably would have beaten Oscar that night.

The Malinaggi win isn't the best, but Malignaggi was not weight drained or negatively affected in any way and so the win should not be downplayed for those reasons. Yes, he is c/b level, but it was a very easy win for Hatton.

I'm a Hatton fan but i'm not deluded to the truth.

[strugler]

LOL you're so funny..

Mayweather beat Hatton because he's on another level. FACT. No excuses there.

Hatton probably would have beaten Oscar that night.

The Malinaggi win isn't the best, but Malignaggi was not weight drained or negatively affected in any way and so the win should not be downplayed for those reasons. Yes, he is c/b level, but it was a very easy win for Hatton.

I'm a Hatton fan but i'm not deluded to the truth.

speculations at best. not likely based on hattons performance at welterweight.

[- JCHING -]

speculations at best. not likely based on hattons performance at welterweight.

Speculations - hence the word probably. We will never know but Hatton only lost to Mayweather at welterweight and ODLH was in no where near good fighting condition that night. So logic dictates a Hatton win.

[Titing Kabayo]

LOL you're so funny..

Mayweather beat Hatton because he's on another level. FACT. No excuses there.

Hatton probably would have beaten Oscar that night.

The Malinaggi win isn't the best, but Malignaggi was not weight drained or negatively affected in any way and so the win should not be downplayed for those reasons. Yes, he is c/b level, but it was a very easy win for Hatton.

I'm a Hatton fan but I'm not deluded to the truth.

Malignaggi was worst than Oscar hugging and begging hatton for his dear life the whole fight... Oscar at least keep on coming forward and taking punches by heart... Malignaggi already knows he will lost and fact is, hatton was favored... A weight drained Oscar would beat Malignaggi faster than Hatton did... I don't know what will be your excuse when Pacquiao beat Hatton's bad ass come May 2.. Another weight drained is possible..

[gopi11]

Speculations - hence the word probably. We will never know but Hatton only lost to Mayweather at welterweight and ODLH was in no where near good fighting condition that night. So logic dictates a Hatton win.

It didn't dawn on you that only Pacquiao's fight plan and style was the only one that could get the job done that night against Oscar? Hatton's style is way different than Pacquiao's style, we can't even find any similarities...

[- JCHING -]

Malignaggi was worst than Oscar hugging and begging hatton for his dear life the whole fight... Oscar at least keep on coming forward and taking punches by heart... Malignaggi already knows he will lost and fact is, hatton was favored... A weight drained Oscar would beat Malignaggi faster than Hatton did... I don't know what will be your excuse when Pacquiao beat Hatton's bad ass come May 2.. Another weight drained is possible..

Hatton was slightly favoured before the Malignaggi fight, with a fair few people pickng Malignaggi. A weight drained Oscar may have beaten Malignaggi, but it would have been a close fight still. Hatton destroyed Malignaggi.

My excuse on May 2nd should Pacquiao beat Hatton is that Pacquiao was just too good and is the better fighter. There will be no excuses.

[strugler]

Speculations - hence the word probably. We will never know but Hatton only lost to Mayweather at welterweight and ODLH was in no where near good fighting condition that night. So logic dictates a Hatton win.

speculations at best. Logical ? naaaaah .based on ricky's performance at welterweight. no bias just logic.
Is a win possible? sure. better than pac? highly unlikely.

[- JCHING -]

It didn't dawn on you that only Pacquiao's fight plan and style was the only one that could get the job done that night against Oscar? Hatton's style is way different than Pacquiao's style, we can't even find any similarities...

And you know that Pac's style and game plan was the ONLY way to beat Oscar that night, how?

Cotto, Mosely, Mayweather, Margarito all would have beaten Oscar that night and their styles are different to Pac's also.