Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Larry Holmes Vs Vitaly Klitschko (better era)?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by jreckoning View Post
    Yeah, it takes two to tango and the guys in the 70's benefitted from being involved in great match ups.

    Seems like Vitali doesn't get a chance to test his skill against someone coming to fight and fighting.


    He did an lost badly to a shell of a Lennox Lewis.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Testdead View Post
      Norton/Shavers/Spinks/Berbick all prime or close to it ****s this gen.
      That was definetely not the belief. Norton was over the hill. Spinks a LHW (and that was at the end of Larrys run anyway). Shavers could **** but nothing else. Berbick...... LMAO.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by TEDetc View Post
        Erm Norton was 35 not that old really and Witherspoon was a "typical 80s fighter" ? LOL. I could name some more fighters if you'd like there was more than just Norton and Witherspoon but you already knew that. So either 1) You're trolling or 2) You're a nut-hugger. Don't insult my boxing knowledge btw "I WILL GO BY WHAT I WITNESSED U GO BY WAT U RED!" No, I witnessed it aswell or I wouldn't be commenting on the matter, you ****ing dolt.
        Why does everybody feel so insulted every time someone else doesn't agree with them?? A dolt??

        Get over yourself man!!!

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by street bully View Post
          Holmes had the better era, fought better fighter, beat the better fighters, went undefeated for years, had 25 title defences and had more skills and talent than Vitalli.

          Holmes is better than Vitalli in every aspect. PERIOD.
          every aspect except head to head, where vitali would demolish him easily.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Testdead View Post
            He did an lost badly to a shell of a Lennox Lewis.
            You obviously never saw the fight fight .. did you??

            Here, educate yourself..


            Comment


            • #36
              haha Vitali's so great he nearly beat lennox Lewis, even Oliver McCall and Rahman got the job done.

              Lennox + big belly + inactivity = surely equals a win for a great fighter?

              Comment


              • #37
                Prme for Prime....Vitali KO's Holmes

                Too big, too strong, too tough and too powerful for Holmes

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Welter_Skelter View Post
                  You obviously never saw the fight fight .. did you??

                  Here, educate yourself..



                  A 38yo Lewis that trained for Byrd and 4wks that had Vitali dont after a 5th round uppercut.

                  Vomon a fully prep Lewis destroys Vitali.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Randall_Hopkirk View Post
                    haha Vitali's so great he nearly beat lennox Lewis, even Oliver McCall and Rahman got the job done.

                    Lennox + big belly + inactivity = surely equals a win for a great fighter?
                    Vitali + 2 weeks preparation + major cuts = nearly beats a fully prepared Lewis who had a 2 month camp preparing for dangerous challenger.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Prme for Prime....Vitali KO's Holmes

                      Too big, too strong, too tough and too powerful for Holmes
                      Shavers was more powerful than Vitali, that fight didn't go down well. Holmes would school Klitscho in a fight. I swear this site has a lot of new comers who know no more than ****.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP