Racial Genetics in boxing

[Horus]

HOW IS IT TRUE? ARE YOU FUUUUUUUUUUUKKKING ******ED? Just because YOU want it to be true, IT'S TRUE??

LMFAO, I'm done with your pea brained 10th percentile intelligence posts. You are 99% correct?? Now, how the *** did you come to that conclusion? Right, the same way you come to all your conclusions, you want it to be.

Like I said, you're a ***ing joke and anyone who takes you seriously must be as dumb as you.

if I am "FUUUUUUUUUUUKKKING ******ED" like you say,
What does that make you for trying to argue with a ******ed person?

and asking a ******ed person to "provide facts"
think about that, and get back to me

lol @ at the incredible ******ity and contradictions people put on themselves
while trying to make other people look foolish.

[Pullcounter]

Its not their genetic superiority, but the fact that the strongest bodies were bred

so you're saying they were bred to be genetically superior in terms of physical ability

[eli porter]

I don’t know where you got that the idea that I believe a child gets more genes from 1 parent than the other...but I think you need to reexamine what I wrote and reexamine what you comprehended from what I wrote.

Do you understand what genetic prominence is?

so wait a moment. are you trying to say that the genes peculiar to white people are recessive?

genetic prominence is a gibberish phrase btw.

(there are examples of black communites dying out purely through breeding, would this evidence change your mind?)

[Horus]

so you're saying they were bred to be genetically superior in terms of physical ability

So if blacks are superior in terms of physical ability, what are other races in terms of physical ability? inferior ?

So does that mean this pac think blacks are Physically Superior to other races of the world?

Isnt that racist?

[BOSSHOGG]

nobody has the advantage just because their skin color....this thread is ******.

[Horus]

so wait a moment. are you trying to say that the genes peculiar to white people are recessive?

genetic prominence is a gibberish phrase btw.

(there are examples of black communites dying out purely through breeding, would this evidence change your mind?)

I am telling you that we have Dominate and Recessive genes.
Each parent gives only one of its pair(gene) to its kid.

Example:
you have two copies of each gene that you inherited from your mother and your father. Each copy of the gene could be different. For example one copy may give you blue eyes while another may give you brown.

So, what color are your eyes if you have both the brown and blue eye version of the eye color gene?

Brown.

This is where the idea of dominant and recessive comes in. Dominant means that one of the versions trumps the other.

So with that being said:

the point I wanted to make was Blacks have more genetic prominence,distinction, visibility over non-blacks.

Meaning that the physical features that are prominent among Black people show up more in mixed raced children that includes blacks and non-blacks

[eli porter]

I am telling you that we have Dominate and Recessive genes.
Each parent gives only one of its pair(gene) to its kid.

Example:
you have two copies of each gene that you inherited from your mother and your father. Each copy of the gene could be different. For example one copy may give you blue eyes while another may give you brown.

So, what color are your eyes if you have both the brown and blue eye version of the eye color gene?

Brown.

This is where the idea of dominant and recessive comes in. Dominant means that one of the versions trumps the other.

I understand what dominant and recessive genes are I'm just struggling to understand what this has to do with this discussion. It's an irrelevence.

also, are you suggesting that genes idiosyncratic to black people are dominant? if so this is a rediculously arbitrary view.

Though brown eyes are more dominant I clearly don't see the significance of this, as you seem to be able to.

[Horus]

Pacmanjay by your own standards you are a racist.

[Pacmanjay]

so you're saying they were bred to be genetically superior in terms of physical ability

Gotta love the scientists and philosophers in a boxing forum...

No, I'm not saying ANYTHING about genetic superiority or inferiority. It's a fact that when you breed any type of living thing, if you keep breeding the ones with certain genes the group will eventually have more with that type of genes. In this case we are talking about physical ability for boxing (strength, speed, etc). And yes because the physically strongest ones able to do the most slave labor were bred, there are more, as a percentage of the group's population, physically stronger black people.

Now if you want to argue that there are more stronger white people (just strength wise) then its because there are many more white people in this world than the number of ****** who were bred. In my opinion the physically strongest race is white people. If whites were bred like blacks, there would be even more strong white people in this world. But the fact is that whites aren't as athletic/agile and it will be a negative in boxing. Do I really have to mention this?

On the other hand speed/explosiveness which has to do with fast twitch muslces fibers are a genetic trait of black people. If you want to argue this, then you're as dumb as Horus. Just look at the 100-400 m race field in track and field events.

Proof that strength was due to breeding of ****** is the fact that 90% of strong black people are from countries where there were black ****** in the past several hundred years. You don't see that many strong black people from Africa. But you do see still see fast runners from Africa.

So if blacks are superior in terms of physical ability, what are other races in terms of physical ability? inferior ?

I NEVER SAID blacks are superior in terms of physical ability. Having superior physical ability vs more people from a population having a certain ability are two different things.

Look at your dumb ass now jumping to conclusion about physical ability and inferiority. You would like to (or you already do ) believe others are physically inferior, wouldn't you?

So does that mean this pac think blacks are Physically Superior to other races of the world?

Isnt that racist?

No, it doesn't. And thanks for jumping to another conclusion with your pea brain.

[Horus]

Gotta love the scientists and philosophers in a boxing forum...

No, I'm not saying ANYTHING about genetic superiority or inferiority. It's a fact that when you breed any type of living thing, if you keep breeding the ones with certain genes the group will eventually have more with that type of genes. In this case we are talking about physical ability for boxing (strength, speed, etc). And yes because the physically strongest ones able to do the most slave labor were bred, there are more, as a percentage of the group's population, physically stronger black people.

Now if you want to argue that there are more stronger white people (just strength wise) then its because there are many more white people in this world than the number of ****** who were bred. In my opinion the physically strongest race is white people. If whites were bred like blacks, there would be even more strong white people in this world. But the fact is that whites aren't as athletic/agile and it will be a negative in boxing. Do I really have to mention this?

On the other hand speed/explosiveness which has to do with fast twitch muslces fibers are a genetic trait of black people. If you want to argue this, then you're as dumb as Horus. Just look at the 100-400 m race field in track and field events.

Proof that strength was due to breeding of ****** is the fact that 90% of strong black people are from countries where there were black ****** in the past several hundred years. You don't see that many strong black people from Africa. But you do see still see fast runners from Africa.






I NEVER SAID blacks are superior in terms of physical ability. Having superior physical ability vs more people from a population having a certain ability are two different things.

Look at your dumb ass now jumping to conclusion about physical ability and inferiority. You would like to (or you already do ) believe others are physically inferior, wouldn't you?




No, it doesn't. And thanks for jumping to another conclusion with your pea brain.

Your such tool.
and have no comprehension of what you want to say and what you are actually saying.

lol

Your just a loser in general.