Racial Genetics in boxing

[Horus]

the dudes right...why are people so angry bout it

because the truth doesnt fit their world view.
so they look for dirt in the sand to prove that sand is no different from dirt because it has dirt mix in it.

when we all know sand is noticeably different from dirt.

this is what is called ignorance. when you cant see what your eyes are showing you.

[Ben_London.]

because the truth doesnt fit their world view.
so they look for dirt in the sand to prove that sand is no different from dirt because it has dirt mix in it.

when we all know sand is noticeably different from dirt.

this is what is called ignorance. when you cant see what your eyes are showing you.

KostyaTysyu44 is just a naive little 15 year old. That's why you can so easily convince him that black people are the superior race, Horus.

Maybe when he matures, he'll realize that we are all equal. No race is superior or inferior to any other.

Those ideas of racial superiority should have died with Adolf Hitler (who, by the way, considered Slavic people like me to be racially inferior to Western Europeans).

[Horus]

Look I am no geneticist


But the point I wanted to make was Blacks have more genetic prominence over non-blacks.

Meaning that the physical features that are prominent among Black people show up more in mixed raced children that includes blacks and non-blacks

This was the point I wanted to get across.

Because as I said before only 6 genes out of 40,000 genes that makes us human determine race.
__________________

hey fist what is racist about this post when it is generally true.
of course hardly anything is ever 100% correct but If i am 99% Right that 1% doesnt change the fact the im 99% RIGHT.

[eli porter]

hey fist what is racist about this post when it is generally true.
of course hardly anything is ever 100% correct but If i am 99% Right that 1% doesnt change the fact the im 99% RIGHT.

I honestly don't know why you believe a child will inherit more genes from a black parent then a white parent. It's a bizarre idea at best, and a ******ed one at worst.

[Pacmanjay]

because the truth doesnt fit their world view.
so they look for dirt in the sand to prove that sand is no different from dirt because it has dirt mix in it.

when we all know sand is noticeably different from dirt.

this is what is called ignorance. when you cant see what your eyes are showing you.

You're one funny ass muther ****er. You know that? When other people don't accept your view, they are ignorant, but you can't even start to realize your own ignorance. Stop using ******ed analogies to support your ******ed claims. Instead bring some proof to the table. No the fact that your teeny tiny brain wants to believe that black genes are dominant doesn't make it proof.

[Pacmanjay]

hey fist what is racist about this post when it is generally true.
of course hardly anything is ever 100% correct but If i am 99% Right that 1% doesnt change the fact the im 99% RIGHT.

HOW IS IT TRUE? ARE YOU FUUUUUUUUUUUKKKING ******ED? Just because YOU want it to be true, IT'S TRUE??

LMFAO, I'm done with your pea brained 10th percentile intelligence posts. You are 99% correct?? Now, how the *** did you come to that conclusion? Right, the same way you come to all your conclusions, you want it to be.

Like I said, you're a ***ing joke and anyone who takes you seriously must be as dumb as you.

[Horus]

I honestly don't know why you believe a child will inherit more genes from a black parent then a white parent. It's a bizarre idea at best, and ******ed at worst.

I don’t know where you got that the idea that I believe a child gets more genes from 1 parent than the other...but I think you need to reexamine what I wrote and reexamine what you comprehended from what I wrote.

Do you understand what genetic prominence is?

[Esquire Dale]

I'm half welsh, 1/4 italian, 1/8 hispanic, 1/8 arab

It's a good mix.

Warning* gay photo:

[Pacmanjay]

Slavery has existed among ALL races since the beginning of time. Your unwillingness to acknowledge that it existed among blacks shows a utopian fantasy, one that says "all the others were bad, but WE were not"...

starting to get messy!! took a lot longer than I thought.
But yes slavery existed EVERYWHERE for centuries, the Roman ****** in the Collesseum (sp?) fighting, Egyption ****** built the Pyramids. Khan's army gave defeated soldiers the choice of fighting for him or death, another form of slavery.

You guys are partly right. Long before people from other parts of the world enslaved racially different people from other parts of the world, they enslaved each other. When people didn't even know what existed just a few hundred miles from them, they fought each other and the winner usually enslaved the losers. Chinese enslaved chinese, whites enslaved each other, etc. It was actually very common for people of the same race to enslave each other.

But the difference is in the magnitude and era when blacks were enslaved. When people of the same race enslaved each other, they didn't breed them like animals. Otherwise you would see as much physically gifted people from all races. Yes, I am saying that more blacks are physically gifted. If you think otherwise, it is ignorant. Its not their genetic superiority, but the fact that the strongest bodies were bred over and over. If you do that to any race for hundreds of years they will have more of these type of people as well.

[Pacmanjay]

I don’t know where you got that the idea that I believe a child gets more genes from 1 parent than the other...but I think you need to reexamine what I wrote and reexamine what you comprehended from what I wrote.

Do you understand what genetic prominence is?

there you go again, talking to you is like talking to a crackhead. ****** but stubborn. everyone should just ignore this dumb muther***er.