Hopkins should not have gotten to 20 defenses

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • andrewcuff
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 1790
    • 83
    • 57
    • 2,078

    #11
    You make it sound like Hopkins' rabbit punch was the only dirty part of the part. It was a bad punch on Hopkins' part, but Echols was fighting dirty all night. What about that body slam? Disgraceful.

    Comment

    • Jim Jeffries
      rugged individualist
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2007
      • 20740
      • 1,376
      • 2,868
      • 54,838

      #12
      I still don't see how the first Allen fight counts as a defense.

      Comment

      • Mr. Philadel
        #215Boxing
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2008
        • 20893
        • 1,071
        • 1,413
        • 35,332

        #13
        Originally posted by DWiens421
        There is no way in hell that he should not have gotten DQ'd against Echols for that loaded up rabbit punch in the rematch...

        That's just nuts man, I can't believe Hopkins wasn't worried about accidentally killing him with that shot.
        the fight was a mess.....both dudes were foulin'!

        Comment

        • The Hammer
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 50797
          • 3,416
          • 8,704
          • 58,851

          #14
          We hear a lot about Joe Calzaghe's title defenses, but many of Hopkin's opponents were no better.

          Comment

          • street bully
            Tua's daddy.
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jan 2008
            • 25014
            • 697
            • 263
            • 35,118

            #15
            Echols almost broke Hopkins shoulder with a WWF style body slam. If anyone should have gotten DQ'ed it's Echols.

            Comment

            • Dorian
              The P4P King
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2005
              • 26501
              • 1,652
              • 2,198
              • 42,879

              #16
              I havn't had the chance to see the fight, I'll check it out then tell my opniion, but it sounds like a typical Hopkins fight.

              Comment

              • larryx
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • May 2008
                • 13892
                • 225
                • 108
                • 15,442

                #17
                Originally posted by Gene Tunney
                We hear a lot about Joe Calzaghe's title defenses, but many of Hopkin's opponents were no better.
                come on tunney no 1 even mentioned joe..hell the tito and oscar win on hopkins resume>>>>>any win on joes

                Comment

                • TheGreatA
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 14143
                  • 633
                  • 271
                  • 21,863

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Dorian
                  I havn't had the chance to see the fight, I'll check it out then tell my opniion, but it sounds like a typical Hopkins fight.
                  It was a great fight.

                  Comment

                  • IMDAZED
                    Fair but Firm
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2006
                    • 42644
                    • 1,134
                    • 1,770
                    • 67,152

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Gene Tunney
                    We hear a lot about Joe Calzaghe's title defenses, but many of Hopkin's opponents were no better.
                    Yeah except Echols knocked Charles Brewer out in three rounds and that's among Joe's five best wins IMO. Worse 6-7. Echols isn't that high on Hopkins' list.

                    Furthermore, Antwun Echols wasn't a bad fighter...at least before Hops took a few years off his career. BOTH of those fights are just brilliant and I encourage all boxing fans to watch them. Hopkins boxed so beautifully in the first fight and showed incredible skill. Then in the rematch got down and dirty and straight up out-manned a rugged ****er in Echols. So rugged he moved to 168 and damaged Brewer with every punch that landed. I miss those Executioner days.

                    Comment

                    • -EX-
                      Trading Block Tycoon
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jan 2006
                      • 21258
                      • 720
                      • 689
                      • 32,678

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Gene Tunney
                      We hear a lot about Joe Calzaghe's title defenses, but many of Hopkin's opponents were no better.
                      Bernard's resume still ****z on Joe's. I know it hurts you to know that...lol

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP