Marquez is a lucky fighter
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
I would say he's been a sore loser in response to the pacquiao loss which has turned me off a little bit ever since then. Dont get me wrong i still like him and boy do i have a ton of respect for his ability and proud that he has represented mexico well but i dont like how he responded to the loss.Comment
-
Actually Morales lost 5 of his last 6 fights. Guess who was the only person he DID beat? And the explanation that he beat him twice after that is not valid. Even a blind person could tell that that wasn't the morales we knew (especially in the third fight). He lost to Zareer Raheem before he lost to Pac.
P.S. Pac is one of my favorite fighters, but to label a great fighter like JMM a lucky fighter and try to discredit his victories is not fair to say the least. JMM doesn't have the natural talents Pac has (speed, power), but yet had 2 very close fights with Pac that could have gone either way.Comment
-
I would say he's been a sore loser in response to the pacquiao loss which has turned me off a little bit ever since then. Dont get me wrong i still like him and boy do i have a ton of respect for his ability and proud that he has represented mexico well but i dont like how he responded to the loss.
What did you want him to say? "Hooray I lost to Pacman by one questionable round".Comment
-
First of all i feel marquez is a good fighter, but a very lucky one. Hist first fight with pac he should have lost because of a misjudged scorecard. Against barrera the ref failed to score a knock down which changed the direction of the fight. against casamayor the fight was even but for a lucky punch. against diaz he was losing but for a cut that changed the fight.
Barrera is shot to pieces
Casa at 37 is more shot than a howitzer shell
J Diaz was whooping jmm, but Diaz is squeamish, scared of his own blood! jeez! i mean common, if you're scared to bleed you shouldn't be boxing is all i'm saying. i'm not sure about lucky, i think it's all coincidental lol!Comment
Comment