Marquez is a lucky fighter

[fcastro1]

inexperiance??this guy is a 2 time champ with over 30 fights

hes been cut twice and lost twice.

[IMDAZED]

this is seriousely double standards. marquez is king because he beats the lineal champ in casamayor. but pac doesn't if he beats the lineal champ at 140.

1. When did I say anything about Marquez being king?

2. What fan gives a hoot about the linear anything in this day and age when Carlos Baldomir can put his name aside the greats who once held that crown? I don't give a **** about that, give me the best fights.

[larryx]

hes been cut twice and lost twice.

thats his problem...........................

[fcastro1]

jmm did out box him..pacman won a split decision after knocking him down which=jmm won more rounds...dont get it twisted i like me some pacman..im just proving your being biased against jmm

marquez is a good fighter, im just trying to show people that performance doesn't get you ahead of pac. pac beat him and is fighting guys 1-2 times bigger than diaz.

[1SILVA]

First of all i feel marquez is a good fighter, but a very lucky one. Hist first fight with pac he should have lost because of a misjudged scorecard. Against barrera the ref failed to score a knock down which changed the direction of the fight. against casamayor the fight was even but for a lucky punch. against diaz he was losing but for a cut that changed the fight.

Marquez is one of the greatest Mexican fighters to ever lace up a pair of gloves. He has given Pacquaio more trouble than any elite fighter has. He is at worst the third best fighter in the world. He is great, not lucky.

[fcastro1]

Marquez is one of the greatest Mexican fighters to ever lace up a pair of gloves. He has given Pacquaio more trouble than any elite fighter has. He is at worst the third best fighter in the world. He is great, not lucky.

know one gets a pass in critiscm on this forum so why should marquez. people do it about pac all the time. marquez is great but he had some fortune.

[MANGLER]

[QUOTE=fcastro1;4842956][B]Hist first fight with pac he should have lost because of a misjudged scorecard. Against barrera the ref failed to score a knock down which changed the direction of the fight.


These parts are true, but the final scores (which were a disgrace) in the MAB fight showed it wouldn't have mattered. People should quit dissin JMM. He's a very good fighter who's had some good and bad breaks.

[ulises_solis]

dude all his losses has been close contest that coulda gone either way how is he a lucky fighter? he could be undefeated with a little more luck
unlike pac whos losses have been unquestionable except that ko-lowblow ****

[Pullcounter]

jmm beat 2 champions back to back at 135..thats what hes saying

casamayor lost to santa cruz and diaz lost to campbell.

the legit champ at 135 was campbell. jmm is the king of 135 by default because campbell cant make 135 anymore.

[Pullcounter]

dude all his losses has been close contest that coulda gone either way how is he a lucky fighter? he could be undefeated with a little more luck
unlike pac whos losses have been unquestionable except that ko-lowblow ****

pac gets better as he gets older