How come Paul Williams is rank higher than Miguel Cotto

[Roger Mellie]

I don't want to change topics but I have to ask...what's a knuckle duster?

Ask senor Capetillo

[T.Horton]

Ask senor Capetillo

Oh, the Margarito thing. Gotcha.

[T.Horton]

Why????????

lol Why? Because Cotto lost to him while Williams beat him.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

Wich Champions? Verno Phillip or the great Andy Kolle?

Still no answer, ha, Dominicano?

[T.Horton]

Still no answer, ha, Dominicano?

Bro, he never said that Williams fought champs at 154 and 160. He said he has fought at all of those weights; 147, 154, 160 in his last three fights or so.

[savorduhflavor]

lol Why? Because Cotto lost to him while Williams beat him.

Triangle theory don't work.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

lol Why? Because Cotto lost to him while Williams beat him.

It took Williams 13 rounds to get to Quintana while Cotto KO him in 5. Margarito disposed Cotto in 11 and when 12 with williiams.

[T.Horton]

Triangle theory don't work.

Not on a who beats whom level. I agree, you cannot base who would beat who with that theory, however, you can use that theory when ranking opposition can't you?

[T.Horton]

It took Williams 13 rounds to get to Quintana while Cotto KO him in 5. Margarito disposed Cotto in 11 and when 12 with williiams.

So what sir?

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

Bro, he never said that Williams fought champs at 154 and 160. He said he has fought at all of those weights; 147, 154, 160 in his last three fights or so.

No???? And what teh **** this means?

I don't know, maybe because he is beating champions?