Roach is Not Concerned With Ricky Hatton's Body Attack

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • S A M U R A I
    Bulletproof
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2008
    • 181694
    • 1,495
    • 1,324
    • 1,419,318

    #81
    Originally posted by boxinguitarfan
    not really a pacfan or hater, pakya far more likable than other fighters hes a humble guy and has a good heart ,the whole overblown thing just gets to hardcore fans because we all know he isnt sugar ray robinson like they keep pushing him as.i think he will most likely beat hatton but you put him in there with an equal force and pakyas in trouble.
    I can't stand it when people exaggerate to try and get their own malformed point across. Why is it always the same **** around here?

    I have never -- and I repeat NEVER -- seen anyone compare Pacquiao to Robinson. The closest you'll get to anything like that is people comparing his recent accomplishments to Henry Armstrong's, and while that is slightly far fetched, it isn't all that close from realistic.

    Who the hell is "pakya" anyway? If you're that much of a hardcore fan you'd at least attempt to spell his name correctly.



    100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3
    Last edited by S A M U R A I; 02-25-2009, 08:50 PM.

    Comment

    • GRUSTLER
      Undisputed champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2008
      • 14118
      • 444
      • 115
      • 20,934

      #82
      [QUOTE=strugler;4818615]
      Originally posted by GRUSTLER
      Hey man, I'm tired of trying to talk about what it really is on here. Manny Pacquiao is a great offensive, exciting fighter but it's not like he is a master technician in the ring & defensive wizard so he can get his clock cleaned at any given time. I think both fighters are very good but for people to say Manny is SO GREAT & can't be beat by Hatton & he is just a better boxer than Ricky Hatton is not true to me. Manny is just faster bottom line. Hatton has speed
      and pop in his punches & Manny gets caught flush.

      I even saw Manny swing with his eyes close in the 2nd JMM fight? & how do we know how good Manny is when he fought David Diaz at 135 then jump to Oscar. A lot of people thought Oscar would win but clearly De La Hoya didn't come to fight. Manny in my opinion has not been tested by a strong fighter since JMM
      & he was 35!! & Manny connected on him all day & couldn't put him away? Hatton is comfortable at 140 & carries power.

      I know everyone is excited about Pacquiao but man........Can't people tell reading all of the articles that Hatton is HUNGRY? He's cutting old habits and staying in the Gym while Manny is on his politician grind. I can't wait till the fight!! I'm riding with Hatton on this one but may the best man win. Ricky is used to fighting bigger guys and taking their punches Manny is not. What makes Manny so dominate over Hatton? Manny has NO defense!!!!!![/QUOTE]

      Flat out lie......
      Why would I lie about Manny Pacquiao? I watched many of his fights & he's been hit flush on Numerous occasions rocked or wobbled by Barrera, Morales, Marquez 2x. Pacquiao likes to engage and **** with his opponents and he jumps in and out throwing punches, is that a lie? JMM is a better technical fighter than Pacquiao and he proved it but Pacquiao was just the bigger puncher and Marquez didn't fight his fight because he fell into Pacquiao's department and that's brawling and lost by a close decision. Is that a lie?

      Comment

      • strugler
        Banned
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jan 2009
        • 6311
        • 101
        • 53
        • 6,632

        #83
        Originally posted by boxinguitarfan
        pakya was out landed in both fights compubox , bad decisions shoulda been both pakya losses judges dont always make the proper decision ,they went with the most popular marketable guy, good early knockdowns but lost the rest of the way in both fights,won 3rnds in the first fight at best and 5 in the second.outlanded outsmarted.2nd fight closer but pakya got a gift dec no doubt.
        Thats your opinion boy doesnt make it better than mine, It was a close fight so i pretty much understand why you think that.

        Comment

        • -MAKAVELLI-
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Aug 2008
          • 50080
          • 3,580
          • 2,792
          • 169,000

          #84
          [QUOTE=GRUSTLER;4818643]
          Originally posted by strugler

          Why would I lie about Manny Pacquiao? I watched many of his fights & he's been hit flush on Numerous occasions rocked or wobbled by Barrera, Morales, Marquez 2x. Pacquiao likes to engage and **** with his opponents and he jumps in and out throwing punches, is that a lie? JMM is a better technical fighter than Pacquiao and he proved it but Pacquiao was just the bigger puncher and Marquez didn't fight his fight because he fell into Pacquiao's department and that's brawling and lost by a close decision. Is that a lie?





          you know those names you mentioned? those are all future HOFers...they make the hall for being ABLE to hit guys....

          Comment

          • strugler
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jan 2009
            • 6311
            • 101
            • 53
            • 6,632

            #85
            [QUOTE=GRUSTLER;4818643]
            Originally posted by strugler

            Why would I lie about Manny Pacquiao? I watched many of his fights & he's been hit flush on Numerous occasions rocked or wobbled by Barrera, Morales, Marquez 2x. Pacquiao likes to engage and **** with his opponents and he jumps in and out throwing punches, is that a lie? JMM is a better technical fighter than Pacquiao and he proved it but Pacquiao was just the bigger puncher and Marquez didn't fight his fight because he fell into Pacquiao's department and that's brawling and lost by a close decision. Is that a lie?

            Man you said no defence, he knocked down them guys too to be fair does it men they had no defence, Mab, JMM, Morales. yes it a lie, not as good s them maybe but no defence Pleeease.

            Comment

            • S A M U R A I
              Bulletproof
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2008
              • 181694
              • 1,495
              • 1,324
              • 1,419,318

              #86
              Originally posted by GRUSTLER
              Marquez didn't fight his fight because he fell into Pacquiao's department and that's brawling
              Disagree. Pac has gotten away from brawling since he moved up. I believe he can box well, he just loves a tear up.



              100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

              Comment

              • Puntoyhauf
                In Honor of SAMURAI
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2008
                • 1452
                • 131
                • 219
                • 7,852

                #87
                Originally posted by ellwise69
                I'll have enough by fight night mate!
                Whoooaaa! that was fast? last time I saw your points it was 3K+ and now it's 100K+

                Hmmmm... I'm starting to think that.... oh nevermind.

                Comment

                • znarfv_y2k8
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 493
                  • 6
                  • 0
                  • 6,583

                  #88
                  Better not to post than to write scraps...

                  Originally posted by GRUSTLER
                  I don't agree because Hatton NEVER held Malignaggi in that fight and he used his jab and moved his head from side to side to work his way in so he wouldn't get caught. I hear so many people saying how much Pacquiao has improved but he looks like the same guy to me. All he does is move around and lung in swinging trying to out slug his opponent. How can you tell how much he has improved by fighting David Diaz & Oscar De La Hoya? Clearly he wasn't tested
                  in both fights.


                  Ricky Hatton is going to test Pacquiao and I believe he will win because to me Pacquiao is a Great offensive fighter but he doesn't have the defensive tools to keep a prime, strong guy like Hatton away from him for 12 rounds and on top of that Manny's power is an accumulation of punches so he is going to have to mix it up with Hatton to score points or even go for the KO.

                  Pacquiao has NO defensive strategy & gets hit flush in most every fight! If/When Hatton lands a solid power shot there is a big chance that Pacquiao drops. I like Pacquiao but just not that confident in him like everyone else
                  because if a fighter doesn't have any defense then I cannot ride with him fully.
                  I'm tired of reading comments like this discrediting Pacquiao's win over Oscar & Diaz...disrecpecting the ability of Oscar the fact that he fought the prime Floyd & only lost a split decision, & Oscars ahead the first half of that fight just only a year before the dream match & Pac is the underdog...i also doubt Pac's chances on that fight because of the size advantage & 1st time jumps 2 weight division above his usual weight....same thing with Diaz who is the champion of that division with a great chin a test to Pac on his new weight, Diaz also won against Morales...BUT a big BUT, Pacquiao defied all the odds and won all those fights convincingly in style by KO & TKO, now how dare are you to tell that he clearly wasn't tested on both fights....u better stop inventing scrap comments....

                  Different style exposes the weaknesses of their respective opponents, only the better fighter prevails at the end...

                  Comment

                  • start11
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Sep 2008
                    • 237
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    • 6,270

                    #89
                    I think its not also right to say that pacquiao doesn't have defensive skills... Pacquiao has good defense also especially when he moves up his weight... He is now very cautious not to be hit unlike before that he really wanted to fight toe to toe with his opponent... I think he would also do the same with hatton, he will just try to move around and try to hit hatton and not be hit... That would be the gamplan of roach and pac for sure...

                    The problem would be if ever hatton can really close the gap and made to the inside and delivers body shots... But even though he can do that i think pacquiao can take them because if paulie can last 11 rounds with hatton which is way too far compared to pacquiao, how much more pacquiao... If colazzo can stun hatton who haven't fought for more than a year how much more pacquiao...

                    If most of the hattonites are saying that the last 2 fight of pacquiao is not genuine, same goes to hatton... If i would compare their last to fight, pacquiao fought better opponents for me than hatton and way more impressive...

                    Hatton has a chance but i give pacquiao a better chance... Hatton's powerful body punch can't be underestimated since he is really good at it...

                    I can't wait anymore... I hope its already may 2... Its a war for sure...

                    Comment

                    • 1000 Left Fist
                      Banned
                      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 919
                      • 57
                      • 14
                      • 1,651

                      #90
                      come on idiots. do ya think freddie and manny is that ******? this is to hype up the fight. they will study everything and won't take it lightly.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP