Should Miguel Cotto be given his 0 back?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Rican
    Banned
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Feb 2009
    • 35
    • 2
    • 1
    • 59

    #1

    Should Miguel Cotto be given his 0 back?

    Seriously, should he?

    I say yes for the obvious reasons.

    Agree? Disagree?

    Why?

    [Please avoid the redundant "there is no way to prove he did it against Cotto" arguement we are past that people. He's been found guilty which makes it that much more likely that he actually did do it. So lets have an intelligent discussion and not talk in circles. Thanks.]
    124
    Yes
    34.68%
    43
    No
    65.32%
    81
  • RL_GMA
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2008
    • 10271
    • 507
    • 103
    • 26,636

    #2
    I think it's one of those things in Boxing that'll never be answered, but everyone will have a "strong" opinion about it (especially if they never fight again).

    Comment

    • Fenom
      No Ceilings
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2008
      • 2663
      • 133
      • 77
      • 9,305

      #3
      if Margaritos found guilty of using banned wraps in their first fight?

      i seriously would petition for it

      Comment

      • Sweet Pea 50
        Predator....
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jan 2006
        • 34573
        • 2,336
        • 2,403
        • 81,317

        #4
        What a great thread. How about

        [IMG]http://i20.***********.com/albums/b213/NROOF13/stfu.jpg[/IMG]

        and be like Cotto, and handle the **** with CLASS.

        Comment

        • Ch@mpBox@PR
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 21432
          • 432
          • 279
          • 22,261

          #5
          Nope. he should get a NC. Cotto didnt won the fight to get a W on his record!!!!!!!

          Comment

          • williamhvx1
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2008
            • 1170
            • 37
            • 71
            • 7,773

            #6
            nah ... as puertorican... he dint have the right fight plan, regardless margacheato cheating dilema....

            Comment

            • hammerhiem
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • May 2008
              • 4877
              • 129
              • 102
              • 11,163

              #7
              No, you can't change past results without clear evidence or admittion of guilt.

              Comment

              • Underdog82
                Banned
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Jun 2007
                • 953
                • 43
                • 0
                • 1,116

                #8
                No, even though I firmly believe that Margarito was cheating with the glove thing, I also believe that he still would have won without it. Cotto was gassed and hurting bad from his own offense.

                Comment

                • Jay Lavoe
                  Amateur
                  Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                  • Oct 2008
                  • 10
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  • 6,033

                  #9
                  I would like to think it was all a misunderstanding so we can all see the rematch but if Margarito admitts his hands are wrapped the same for every fight then yes I would petition it but I think at this point cotto is more focused on avenging his loss then getting it taken off. Also at the same time plaster or not he was overwhelmed with the pressure and like he said it was Margaritos night.
                  Last edited by Jay Lavoe; 02-10-2009, 02:02 PM.

                  Comment

                  • Derranged
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2005
                    • 46593
                    • 2,126
                    • 1,351
                    • 162,628

                    #10
                    Originally posted by The Rican
                    Seriously, should he?

                    I say yes for the obvious reasons.

                    Agree? Disagree?

                    Why?

                    [Please avoid the redundant "there is no way to prove he did it against Cotto" arguement we are past that people. He's been found guilty which makes it that much more likely that he actually did do it. So lets have an intelligent discussion and not talk in circles. Thanks.]
                    The problem is, THERE IS NO WAY TO PROVE IT. And to overturn the fight, thats what you would need. PROOF. Its not redundant. Its the hard truth of the matter.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP