Should Miguel Cotto be given his 0 back?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
*** no! He got his ass beat period, plaster conspiracy or not! He fought the wrong fight against a stiff! His fault and no one else's Enuff of the whining! Cotto is ok but yall make him seem like a beast in which that could be no further from the truth. He would lose to Clottey, PW, and maybe Berto.Comment
-
no i dont think he should be given his '' 0 '' back..lol its cotto's chin that gave out and plus miguel cotto aint unbeatable even demarcus corley came close to knocking him out ..either way its gonna happen again in the margarito rematch..miguel cotto is a great fighter but his chin aint that great..its suspectSeriously, should he?
I say yes for the obvious reasons.
Agree? Disagree?
Why?
[Please avoid the redundant "there is no way to prove he did it against Cotto" arguement we are past that people. He's been found guilty which makes it that much more likely that he actually did do it. So lets have an intelligent discussion and not talk in circles. Thanks.]Comment
-
I'm a Cotto fan too and even though I was not the one getting punched with probable fixed hands I still say Cotto should have won that fight not only by unanimous decision but also by knockout. I still think he didn't train 100% for that fight, he was gassed out by the 8th round. One thing I will tell you though, he is a class act, never gave any excuses for loosing the fight....Comment
-
This is the horrible thing about it, because of the controversy we can't know if it was Marg actually winning the fight or Marg using loaded gloves against a guy who was considered on almost all accounts to be superior. To those saying that Cotto wasn't hurting Margarito anyway, it might have been because if Tony was using loaded gloves, his punches were just taking too much out of Cotto for him to keep throwing powerful shots. If Marg is found guilty, the fight should be ruled a NC.Comment
-
you cant prove margo cheated against cotto so cotto should still have a 1 in the loss columnSeriously, should he?
I say yes for the obvious reasons.
Agree? Disagree?
Why?
[Please avoid the redundant "there is no way to prove he did it against Cotto" arguement we are past that people. He's been found guilty which makes it that much more likely that he actually did do it. So lets have an intelligent discussion and not talk in circles. Thanks.]Comment
-
Comment

Comment