Should Miguel Cotto be given his 0 back?

[Sweet Pea 50]

Can't believe there actually 10 votes FOR on this ****. One of them being Tunney. But go ahead, fellas's. Keep on voting for a yes.

[Kastrioti]

If Marg is PROVEN to have used it in the Cotto fight, yes then if not, no. It's that simple. You can't just give him his 0 back because you think there's a good chance Marg did it.

It's not what you know, it's what you can prove.

[Sweet Pea 50]

Anto, BMWM3P, Boricua19355c, El Dominicano, goblin, Jay Lavoe, mickyward5656, sfg, Soldier01, The Rican, ~Tunney

What a bunch of *****s.....

[Ido]

Seriously, should he?

I say yes for the obvious reasons.

Agree? Disagree?

Why?

[Please avoid the redundant "there is no way to prove he did it against Cotto" arguement we are past that people. He's been found guilty which makes it that much more likely that he actually did do it. So lets have an intelligent discussion and not talk in circles. Thanks.]

The State’s Commission has issued its ruling?

[Sweet Pea 50]

Anto, Antwuan Maxx, BMWM3P, Boricua19355c, El Dominicano, goblin, Hex-One, Jay Lavoe, mickyward5656, sfg, Soldier01, The Rican, ~Tunney

The list just keeps on coming....

[cortdawg25]

Cotto still fought a ****** fight. If he had cont to win and fought smarter but was just physically beaten by loaded gloves, then I would say it should be a no contest.

[Sick/]

why should he? he got beat up badly and lost

[KnockoutTheFat]

The problem is, THERE IS NO WAY TO PROVE IT. And to overturn the fight, thats what you would need. PROOF. Its not redundant. Its the hard truth of the matter.

I thought you needed Paul Williams to overturn a fight

[Crazylegs77]

Seriously, should he?

I say yes for the obvious reasons.

Agree? Disagree?

Why?

[Please avoid the redundant "there is no way to prove he did it against Cotto" arguement we are past that people. He's been found guilty which makes it that much more likely that he actually did do it. So lets have an intelligent discussion and not talk in circles. Thanks.]

No, if he had held like Mosley he would have won. He wore out with too much footwork.

[Allucard]

Seriously, should he?

I say yes for the obvious reasons.

Agree? Disagree?

Why?

[Please avoid the redundant "there is no way to prove he did it against Cotto" arguement we are past that people. He's been found guilty which makes it that much more likely that he actually did do it. So lets have an intelligent discussion and not talk in circles. Thanks.]

I voted no. It's not gonna happen. If that happened also Citron would claim his losses back and clottey. Add to that the opportunities these fighters lost because of those defeats and we would have instant mayhem in the boxing world. Simply it would be impossible to do that, that's why the punish for such things should be exemplary.